1979 PLP 529 (PLC)
MUHAMMAD ASIF SIDDIQUI Versus PAK ARAB REFINERY LTD., KARACHI
| Citation | 1979 PLP 529 (PLC) |
| Forum / Court | National Industrial Relations Commission |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD ASIF SIDDIQUI Versus PAK ARAB REFINERY LTD., KARACHI |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1979 PLP 529 (PLC)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1979 PLP 529 (PLC)?
The case was heard and decided by the National Industrial Relations Commission bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1979 PLP 529 (PLC) (MUHAMMAD ASIF SIDDIQUI Versus PAK ARAB REFINERY LTD., KARACHI). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Headnotes / Summary
(a) Pakistan Essential Services (Maintenance) Act (VIII of 1952)‑ ‑‑ S. 5(1), Explanation‑Termination of service‑Excuse for‑Must be reasonable‑Merely stating that services no longer required‑Not enough compliance of S. 5(1) ‑Such termination, held, liable to be set aside. (b) Pakistan Essential Services (Maintenance) Act (VIII of 1952)‑ ‑‑ S. 6‑Specified Authority‑Jurisdiction‑Can deal with cases of individuals or class of persons belonging to establishment covered by the Act in respect of their wages and terms and con ditions of service‑Unjustified and illegal termination of service- Can be challenged before specified Authority to seek re‑instatement. Burmah‑Shell Employees' Union v. Burmah‑Shell Ltd. 1978 L S L R 69 rel.
Judgment & Decree
Case No. 18 (41) of 1978, decided on 31st March, 1979. (a) Pakistan Essential Services (Maintenance) Act (VIII of 1952)‑ ‑‑ S. 5(1), Explanation‑Termination of service‑Excuse for‑Must be reasonable‑Merely stating that services no longer required‑Not enough compliance of S. 5(1) ‑Such termination, held, liable to be set aside. (b) Pakistan Essential Services (Maintenance) Act (VIII of 1952)‑ ‑‑ S. 6‑Specified Authority‑Jurisdiction‑Can deal with cases of individuals or class of persons belonging to establishment covered by the Act in respect of their wages and terms and con ditions of service‑Unjustified and illegal termination of service- Can be challenged before specified Authority to seek re‑instatement. Burmah‑Shell Employees' Union v. Burmah‑Shell Ltd. 1978 L S L R 69 rel.