979 PLP 524 (PLC)
BATA SHOE COMPANY (PAKISTAN) LTD. Versus PAKISTAN BATA EMPLOYEES' FEDERATION (RECD.) AND 2 OTHERS
| Citation | 979 PLP 524 (PLC) |
| Forum / Court | National Industrial Relations Commission |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | BATA SHOE COMPANY (PAKISTAN) LTD. Versus PAKISTAN BATA EMPLOYEES' FEDERATION (RECD.) AND 2 OTHERS |
| Primary Law | Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 979 PLP 524 (PLC)?
This judgment primarily cites: Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 979 PLP 524 (PLC)?
The case was heard and decided by the National Industrial Relations Commission bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 979 PLP 524 (PLC) (BATA SHOE COMPANY (PAKISTAN) LTD. Versus PAKISTAN BATA EMPLOYEES' FEDERATION (RECD.) AND 2 OTHERS). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- M. S. Bokhari for Petitioner.
- Asghar Mahmood for Respondent No. 1.
- Zia Mahmood Mirza for Respondents Nos . 2 and 3.
- Date of hearing : 19th July 1979.
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑ S. 10‑Certificate of C. B. A.‑Cancellation of‑Possible only under S. 10 on conditions laid down there and by .competent authority‑Cancellation petition pressed before National Industrial Relations Commission on ground that Trade Unions affiliated to C. B. A. Federation were not Unions of workers‑Contention that Commission could cancel certificate in view of S. 21 of General Clauses Act (X of 1897)‑Affiliating Trade Unions already declared by competent authority as Workers' Union‑‑Held, unless that status was taken back by legal order of competent authority such Trade Unions would continue to enjoy it and complexion of C. B. A. Federation cannot be deemed. to have changed‑‑NIRC, .further held, had no jurisdiction to cancel certificate of C. B. A for reasons beyond S. 10‑Exercise of jurisdiction of cancellation or variation of an order where pre‑conditioned by words of statute under which such order passed makes provisions of S. 21 of General Clauses Act, 1897 also subject to such pre‑conditions‑ Petition for cancellation, ill circumstances, rejected‑General Clauses Act (X of 1897), S. 21.
Judgment & Decree
Case No. 20 (5) of 1979/NIRC, decided on 19th July, 1979. ‑‑ S. 10‑Certificate of C. B. A.‑Cancellation of‑Possible only under S. 10 on conditions laid down there and by .competent authority‑Cancellation petition pressed before National Industrial Relations Commission on ground that Trade Unions affiliated to C. B. A. Federation were not Unions of workers‑Contention that Commission could cancel certificate in view of S. 21 of General Clauses Act (X of 1897)‑Affiliating Trade Unions already declared by competent authority as Workers' Union‑‑Held, unless that status was taken back by legal order of competent authority such Trade Unions would continue to enjoy it and complexion of C. B. A. Federation cannot be deemed. to have changed‑‑NIRC, .further held, had no jurisdiction to cancel certificate of C. B. A for reasons beyond S. 10‑Exercise of jurisdiction of cancellation or variation of an order where pre‑conditioned by words of statute under which such order passed makes provisions of S. 21 of General Clauses Act, 1897 also subject to such pre‑conditions‑ Petition for cancellation, ill circumstances, rejected‑General Clauses Act (X of 1897), S.
21. M. S. Bokhari for Petitioner. Asghar Mahmood for Respondent No.
1. Zia Mahmood Mirza for Respondents Nos . 2 and