2006 PLP 962 (MLD)
TARIQ MAHMOOD — Petitioner Versus VICE-CHANCELLOR BAHAUDDIN ZAKARIYA UNIVERSITY MULTAN and 2 others-Respondents
| Citation | 2006 PLP 962 (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | TARIQ MAHMOOD — Petitioner Versus VICE-CHANCELLOR BAHAUDDIN ZAKARIYA UNIVERSITY MULTAN and 2 others-Respondents |
| Primary Law | Educational institution |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2006 PLP 962 (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: Educational institution as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2006 PLP 962 (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2006 PLP 962 (MLD) (TARIQ MAHMOOD — Petitioner Versus VICE-CHANCELLOR BAHAUDDIN ZAKARIYA UNIVERSITY MULTAN and 2 others-Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- ----Providing 'Amanuensis' to a blind candidate in examination---Application for---Grievance of petitioner was that he being blind had filed application requesting the University Authorities to provide him 'Amanuensis' in terms of University Regulations, but no order had been passed on his application while examinations were to commence soon and no Roll number had been issued to him---High Court relying on affidavit and Medical Certificate produced by petitioner, directed the University to pass an appropriate order strictly in accordance with the terms of Regulations and appoint an Amanuensis for petitioner and while doing so should give sympathetic consideration to contention of petitioner that one of the persons nominated by him be so appointed provided it was permissible in accordance with Regulations of the University---Roll Number be also issued accordingly without further delay---Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 199.
- Malik Tahir Abbas Awan Advocate.
Headnotes / Summary
Providing 'Amanuensis' to a blind candidate in examination
Application for
Grievance of petitioner was that he being blind had filed application requesting the University Authorities to provide him 'Amanuensis' in terms of University Regulations, but no order had been passed on his application while examinations were to commence soon and no Roll number had been issued to him
High Court relying on affidavit and Medical Certificate produced by petitioner, directed the University to pass an appropriate order strictly in accordance with the terms of Regulations and appoint an Amanuensis for petitioner and while doing so should give sympathetic consideration to contention of petitioner that one of the persons nominated by him be so appointed provided it was permissible in accordance with Regulations of the University
Roll Number be also issued accordingly without further delay
Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 199.
Judgment & Decree
MAULVI ANWARUL HAQ. J.
Presented in Chambers at 2-15 p.m.
2. Heard.
3. According to the contents of the writ petition the petitioner is a blind person as per medical certificate "Annex. F". He is to appear in B.A. Examination commencing' on 22-12-2004. The grievance being made out is that he has filed an application requesting the respondent-University Authorities to provide him Amanuensis in terms of the University Regulations. The application is being processed but whereas the examinations are to commence on 22-12-2004 no order has been passed thereon. It has further been contended by the learned counsel that Roll number has also not been issued so far.
4. I have examined the copies of the documents appended with this writ petition. Relying upon the affidavit of the petitioner and the said medical certificate, I dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the respondents to pass an appropriate order strictly in accordance with the terms of the Regulations and appoint an amanuensis for the petitioner and while doing so should give sympathetic consideration to his contention that one of the persons nominated by him be so appointed, provided it is permissible in accordance with Regulations of the University. The Roll number be also issued accordingly without further delay.
5. Copy be issued Dasti to the learned counsel, to be presented before the respondents along with a copy of the writ petition and its annexures. H.B.T/T-96/L Order accordingly.