2007 PLP 671 (PTD)
KHALIQ DAD RANA Versus INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, LAHORE and 3 others
| Citation | 2007 PLP 671 (PTD) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore High Court |
| Bench Members | Sh. Azmat Saeed and Umar Ata Bandial, JJ |
| Parties | KHALIQ DAD RANA Versus INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, LAHORE and 3 others |
| Primary Law | Wealth Tax Act (XV of 1963) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2007 PLP 671 (PTD)?
This judgment primarily cites: Wealth Tax Act (XV of 1963) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2007 PLP 671 (PTD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore High Court bench comprising: Sh. Azmat Saeed and Umar Ata Bandial, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2007 PLP 671 (PTD) (KHALIQ DAD RANA Versus INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, LAHORE and 3 others). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Imtiaz Javaid for Appellant.
- Khadim Hussain Zahid for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 21st September, 2006.
Headnotes / Summary
Ss. 3 & 27
Assessee filed eleven appeals before High Court arising from a consolidated order raising common question of law
Among said eleven appeals, nine were disposed of by a Division Bench of High Court, remanding all appeals. with direction to amend assessment order and charge Wealth Tax on the property of assessee only to the extent of his share in the property as determined in the civil court, after the agreement reached between assessee and other legal heirs on respective shares in the property
Remaining two appeals, which also involved identical question of law, were also disposed of in said terms.
Judgment & Decree
SH. AZMAT SAEED, J.
Through this judgment, it is proposed to dispose of LT.As. Nos. 393 of 1999 and 394 of 1999 arising from a consolidated judgment of the Tribunal and involving identical question of law.
2. The appellants are assessees under the Wealth Tax Act, 1963 assessees filed eleven appeals before this Court arising from the same consolidated order, dated 26-9-1998 raising common question of law. Amongst the said eleven appeals, nine were disposed off by a Division Bench of this Court vide order, dated 13-12-2005, in the following terms: "(6) In view of the statements of both the learned counsel and without dilating upon the merits of the case, we remand, all the A appeals with direction to amend the assessment order and charge wealth tax on tile property of the appellant only to the extent of his share in the property as determined in the Civil Court, after the agreement reached between the appellant and other legal heirs on respective shares in the property. In terms of the directions given, the appeals are disposed of."
3. The appeals in hand are the remaining two appeals, which also involve identical question of law, consequently, these two above-mentioned appeals are also disposed of in the above terms. H.B.T./K-70/K??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? Order accordingly.