1986 PLP (2) (SCMR)
SIND ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION — Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD ALI G. KHOKHAR — Respondent
| Citation | 1986 PLP (2) (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Abdul Kadir Shaikh, S. A. Nusrat and Zaffar Hussain Mirza, JJ |
| Parties | SIND ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION — Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD ALI G. KHOKHAR — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1986 PLP (2) (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1986 PLP (2) (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Abdul Kadir Shaikh, S. A. Nusrat and Zaffar Hussain Mirza, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1986 PLP (2) (SCMR) (SIND ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION — Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD ALI G. KHOKHAR — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Talmiz S. Burney, Advocate Supreme Court with M.S. Ghoury, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner.
- Ali Akbar, Advocate-on-Record for Respondent.
- Date of hearing: 10th December, 1985.
- Talmiz S. Burney, Advocate Supreme Court with M.S. Ghoury, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
- Ali Akbar, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondent.
Headnotes / Summary
Art. 185(3)--West Pakistan Road Transport Board Rules, 1959, Leave to appeal granted to consider question whether West Pakistan Road Transport Board Rules, 1959, adopted by petitioner-Corporation for regularising terms and conditions of service of their employees were statutory in character and for non-compliance of any of those Rules a Constitutional Petition in High Court was maintainable.
Judgment & Decree
ABDUL KADIR SHAIKH, J.‑‑The question of law involved in this case inter alia, is whether the West Pakistan Road Transport Board, Rules 1959 adopted by the petitioner Corporation for regularising the terms and conditions of service of their employees are statutory in character and for the non‑compliance of any of these rules a constitutional petition in the High Court is maintainable. Leave is granted and the appeal is allowed. Appeal will be heard on the present record but it is open to the parties to file additional documents, if any. M. Y. H. Leave granted.