1988 PLP 1680 (SCMR)
SAFDAR ALI JAVED BOKHARI — Petitioner Versus DEPUTY SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER, SIALKOT and others — Respondents
| Citation | 1988 PLP 1680 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Ghulam Mujaddid Mirza and Saad Saood Jan, JJ |
| Parties | SAFDAR ALI JAVED BOKHARI — Petitioner Versus DEPUTY SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER, SIALKOT and others — Respondents |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1988 PLP 1680 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1988 PLP 1680 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Ghulam Mujaddid Mirza and Saad Saood Jan, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1988 PLP 1680 (SCMR) (SAFDAR ALI JAVED BOKHARI — Petitioner Versus DEPUTY SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER, SIALKOT and others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Abdul Majid Sheikh, Senior Advocate Supreme Court and Tanvir Ahmad, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner.
- Ghulam Mujtaba, Advocate-on-Record (absent) for Respondents. Date of hearing: 5th July, 1988.
- Abdul Majid Sheikh, Senior Advocate Supreme Court and Tanvir Ahmad, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
- Ghulam Mujtaba, Advocate‑on‑Record (absent) for Respondents. Date of hearing: 5th July, 1988.
Headnotes / Summary
(From the order of Lahore High Court dated 11-2-1981 in Writ Petition No.94-R of 1981).
Arts.185(3) & 199--Dismissal of writ petition in limine, challenged- Petitioner's inability to give any satisfactory explanation for inordinate delay in invoking Constitutional jurisdiction of High Court, held, was sufficient to dismiss petition for leave to appeal which even on merits was without any substance.
Judgment & Decree
GHULAM MUJADDID MIRZA, J.‑‑Safdar Ali Javed Bokhari has filed this petition for leave to appeal against the order of the Lahore High Court passed in Constitution Petition No.94‑R of 1981 which was dismissed in limine vide order dated 11‑2‑1981. Learned counsel for the petitioner has not been able to give any satisfactory explanation for the inordinate delay in invoking the Constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court. This alone is sufficient to dismiss the petition. Nevertheless, we have heard learned counsel for the petitioner on merits but we are of the view that the petitioner has no case. Dismissed. M . I . / S‑175 / S Petition dismissed.