2001 P Cr (PLP)
Sayed IRFAN ALI SHAH and another — Applicants Versus THE STATE — Opponent
| Citation | 2001 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | Sayed IRFAN ALI SHAH and another — Applicants Versus THE STATE — Opponent |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2001 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2001 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2001 P Cr (PLP) (Sayed IRFAN ALI SHAH and another — Applicants Versus THE STATE — Opponent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 498
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.337-A(i)/337-F(i)/337-F(v)/ 337-F(vi)/147/148/149/504
Investigation of the case was complete and the challan had been submitted in the Trial Court
Allegations against the accused were of general nature and no specific role was assigned to them
Accused had neither used any weapon in the commission of the offence, nor they were alleged to have caused any injury on any vital part of the body of the injured
Interim- pre-arrest bail granted. to accused was confirmed in circumstances.
Judgment & Decree
S. 498
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.337-A(i)/337-F(i)/337-F(v)/ 337-F(vi)/147/148/149/504
Investigation of the case was complete and the challan had been submitted in the Trial Court
Allegations against the accused were of general nature and no specific role was assigned to them
Accused had neither used any weapon in the commission of the offence, nor they were alleged to have caused any injury on any vital part of the body of the injured
Interim- pre-arrest bail granted. to accused was confirmed in circumstances. Manzoor Ahmed Z. Siddiqui for Applicants. Agha Khuda Bux, Asstt. A.G. for the State. This is a pre-arrest bail application. The applicant was granted interim pre-arrest bail by order, dated 10-8-2000. I heard the counsel, perused the F.I.R. and the impugned order. It is being informed that the investigation has been completed and the challan has been submitted before the trial Court. A perusal of F.I.R. shows that the allegations are general in nature and no specific role has been assigned to the A present applicants. Even otherwise no weapon has been used by the applicants in the commission of offence and further there is no allegation of the injury on the vital part of the injured. In the circumstances, interim bail granted to the applicants on 10-8-2000 is hereby confirmed on same terms and conditions. However, the prosecution will be at liberty to move application for cancellation of bail before the trial Court if during the course of evidence a case is made out for that purpose. Application disposed of. N.H.Q./I-17/K Pre-arrest bail granted.