2002 PLP 52 (MLD)
MANZOOR and another‑‑‑Petitioners Versus STATE‑‑‑Respondent
| Citation | 2002 PLP 52 (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | Shabbir Ahmed, J |
| Parties | MANZOOR and another‑‑‑Petitioners Versus STATE‑‑‑Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2002 PLP 52 (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2002 PLP 52 (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: Shabbir Ahmed, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2002 PLP 52 (MLD) (MANZOOR and another‑‑‑Petitioners Versus STATE‑‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑‑S. 497‑‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.302/504/114/147/148/149‑‑ Bail, grant of‑‑‑No overt act had been assigned to the accused except their presence at the Vardat armed with "Lathi" which had not been used in the occurrence‑‑‑Accused were entitled to grant of bail in circumstances. Abdul Rasool Abbasi for Applicant. Riazuddin Siddiqui for the State.
Judgment & Decree
‑‑‑‑S. 497‑‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.302/504/114/147/148/149‑‑ Bail, grant of‑‑‑No overt act had been assigned to the accused except their presence at the Vardat armed with "Lathi" which had not been used in the occurrence‑‑‑Accused were entitled to grant of bail in circumstances. Abdul Rasool Abbasi for Applicant. Riazuddin Siddiqui for the State.
1. Granted subject to all just exceptions.
2. The applicants Manzoor and Wali Muhammad are facing trial before the Sessions Judge, Dadu in Crime No.55 of 2001 alongwith co accused. The application moved on behalf of the applicants for concession of bail pending trial was dismissed hence the present application. I have heard the learned counsel for the applicants and State Counsel. The State Counsel has opposed the application on the ground that the applicants were members of the unlawful assembly though they were not attributed any overt act except their presence at the Vardat armed with Lathi only to facilitate co‑accused lummo who himself was armed with fire‑arm and caused fire‑arm injuries to Chanesar. Since no overt act has been assigned to the applicants except their presence at the A Vardat armed with Lathi which has not been used. I am of the view that they are entitled for the concession of bail. Consequently the applicants Manzoor and Wali Muhammad are granted bail provided they furnish surety in the sum of Rs.1,00,000 (Rupees one lac) each and P.R. Bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court. H.B.T./M‑255 Bail granted.