SCMR 1986

1986 PLP 1015 (SCMR)

NAIMAT ALI — Petitioner Versus Mirza ABDUL RASHID BAIG and others — Respondents

Jurisdiction / Court
---O. XXVII--Contempt--Respondent and his counsel tendering an unqualified apology and showing contrition--Apologies being sufficient amends, matter of contempt consigned to record.--Contempt of Court.
Decided Date
Criminal Original No. 4-R of 1986 in Civil Review Petition No. 64 of 1980, decided on 1st March, 1986.
Honorable Judges
Muhammad Haleem, C.J., Muhammad Afzal Zullah, Nasim Hasan Shah, Shafiur Rahman and Zaffar Hussain Mirza, JJ
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1986 PLP 1015 (SCMR)
Forum / Court ---O. XXVII--Contempt--Respondent and his counsel tendering an unqualified apology and showing contrition--Apologies being sufficient amends, matter of contempt consigned to record.--Contempt of Court.
Bench Members Muhammad Haleem, C.J., Muhammad Afzal Zullah, Nasim Hasan Shah, Shafiur Rahman and Zaffar Hussain Mirza, JJ
Parties NAIMAT ALI — Petitioner Versus Mirza ABDUL RASHID BAIG and others — Respondents
Primary Law Supreme Court Rules, 1980
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1986 PLP 1015 (SCMR)?

This judgment primarily cites: Supreme Court Rules, 1980 as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1986 PLP 1015 (SCMR)?

The case was heard and decided by the ---O. XXVII--Contempt--Respondent and his counsel tendering an unqualified apology and showing contrition--Apologies being sufficient amends, matter of contempt consigned to record.--Contempt of Court. bench comprising: Muhammad Haleem, C.J., Muhammad Afzal Zullah, Nasim Hasan Shah, Shafiur Rahman and Zaffar Hussain Mirza, JJ.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1986 PLP 1015 (SCMR) (NAIMAT ALI — Petitioner Versus Mirza ABDUL RASHID BAIG and others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Supreme Court Rules, 1980

Representation

  • S. Abul Assim Jaferi, Advocate-on-Record and Ahmad Hasan Khan, Advocate Supreme Court for Petitioner.
  • Mahmood A. Qureshi, Advocate-on-Record for Respondent.
  • Date of hearing: 1st March, 1986.
  • S. Abul Assim Jaferi, Advocate‑on‑Record and Ahmad Hasan Khan, Advocate Supreme Court for Petitioner.
  • Mahmood A. Qureshi, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondent.

Headnotes / Summary

O. XXVII--Contempt--Respondent and his counsel tendering an unqualified apology and showing contrition--Apologies being sufficient amends, matter of contempt consigned to record.--[Contempt of Court].

Judgment & Decree

MUHAMMAD HALEEM, C.J.‑‑Mirza Abdul Rashid on his behalf and on behalf of the other private respondents has tendered an unconditional apology and has further stated that he had withdrawn the suit from the Court of the Civil Budge, Lahore, on 22‑2‑1986. The counsel for the respondent has also shown contrition and has tendered an unqualified apology. These apologies, in our view, are sufficient amends, and, accordingly, we would consign the matter to record. As for the Civil Judge, we do not think that any further proceedings are necessary against him and we consign the matter to record in his case as well. M . Y . H . Petition dismissed.