1992 PLP 1208 (CLC)
MUHAMMAD WARIS and others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus DSC/AC and others‑‑‑Respondents
| Citation | 1992 PLP 1208 (CLC) |
| Forum / Court | |
| Bench Members | Raja Afrasiab Khan, J |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD WARIS and others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus DSC/AC and others‑‑‑Respondents |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973)=‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1992 PLP 1208 (CLC)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973)=‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1992 PLP 1208 (CLC)?
The case was heard and decided by the bench comprising: Raja Afrasiab Khan, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1992 PLP 1208 (CLC) (MUHAMMAD WARIS and others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus DSC/AC and others‑‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Ch. Qadir Bakhsh for Petitioners.
- S.M. Masood for Respondents No.3.
- Date of hearing: 16th December, 1991.
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑‑Art. 199‑‑‑Non‑compliance of earlier order of High Court by official respondent‑‑‑Official respondent making statement before the Court that he would comply with the earlier order of the Court‑‑‑Copies of earlier orders of High Court were directed to be sent to respondent for compliance on or before specified date‑‑‑Compliance report was to be submitted to‑Court through respondent's law officer. Maqbool Elahi Malik, A. ‑G for official Respondents.
Judgment & Decree
Ch. Qadir Bakhsh for Petitioners. Maqbool Elahi Malik, A. ‑G for official Respondents. S.M. Masood for Respondents No.3. Date of hearing: 16th December, 1991. This order shall dispose of Writ Petition No.94/R of 1991 (Muhammad Waris v. Deputy Settlement Commissioner etc.), Writ Petition No.95/R of 1991 (Boots v. Deputy Settlement Commissioner etc.),‑ Writ Petition No.96/R of 1991 (Ali Muhammad v. Deputy Settlement Commissioner etc'.) and Writ Petition No. 97/11 of 1991 (Qadir Bukhsh v. Deputy Settlement Commissioner etc.) together as common questions of law and facts arise in all these matters.
2. On 22‑1‑1991, Mr. Nadir Ijaz, Assistant Commissioner/Notified Officer, Faisalabad City appeared with record of the case. He made a statement that he will comply with the earlier orders of the Court dated 4‑1,1‑1990 and 11‑11‑1990. Grievance of Ch. Qadir Bukhsh, learned counsel for the petitioners is that despite commitment having been made by the learned A Notified Officer, the earlier orders of this Court have not been complied with by the said officer. Mr. Maqbool Elahi Malik, learned Advocate‑General is present. He has no objection if straightaway a direction is given to the Notified Officer for compliance of earlier orders of this Court. In the circumstances, office is directed to send copies of the orders dated 4‑11‑1990, 11‑i1‑1990 and 22‑1‑1991 to the learned Notified Officer, Faisalabad for compliance on or before 15‑1‑1992. A compliance report shall also be submitted to this Court through the learned Advocate‑General. With these observations, these writ petitions stand disposed of with no order as to costs. AA./M‑259/L Order accordingly.