MLD 2009

2009 PLP 149 (MLD)

MUHAMMAD JAFAR and 2 others — Petitioners Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Jurisdiction / Court
Lahore
Decided Date
2008-October-22
Honorable Judges
N/A
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 2009 PLP 149 (MLD)
Forum / Court Lahore
Bench Members N/A
Parties MUHAMMAD JAFAR and 2 others — Petitioners Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Primary Law Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2009 PLP 149 (MLD)?

This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2009 PLP 149 (MLD)?

The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 2009 PLP 149 (MLD) (MUHAMMAD JAFAR and 2 others — Petitioners Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

Representation

  • Muhammad Arif Awan for Petitioners.

Headnotes / Summary

S. 498

Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.337-A(ii), 337-F(i) & 337-L(ii)

Pre-arrest bail, confirmation of

Accused though were named in F.I.R., but general allegation was against them for causing injuries to the injured person

Litigation between parties was admitted in the F.I.R.

Medico-legal Report revealed that no injury had been declared as grievance

One of accused had been found innocent during investigation and the version given in the F.I.R. also did not appear to be in line with medical evidence; because the injured had received only three injuries which had created doubt in the version of the complainant as according to him he received so many injuries

Accused persons had joined the investigation and were not required by the police any further

Case of accused persons fell within the purview of further inquiry and sending them in jail at such stage would not serve any useful purpose to the prosecution

Ad interim bail already granted to accused persons, was confirmed, in circumstances.

Judgment & Decree

ZAFAR IQBAL CHAUDHRY, J.

Through this petition under section 498, Cr.P.C. the petitioners seek pre-arrest bail in case F.I.R. No.645, dated 21-7-2008 registered under sections 337-A(ii)/ 337-F(i)/337-L(ii), P.P.C. at Police Station Ghulam Muhammad Abad District Faisalabad on the application of Muhammad Jamil Shahid.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been involved in this case falsely on account of enmity with the complainant party which has already been admitted in the F.I.R. He further submits that there is general allegation against the petitioners that they caused injuries to Muhammad Jamil Shahid complainant. According to the medico legal report the victim received three injuries but in the F.I.R. it has been alleged that he was given severe beating and he received so many injuries. According to the learned counsel for the petitioners version of the complainant is not in line with the medical evidence. In view of the above, the petitioners are entitled to the concession of pre-arrest bail.

3. Learned DPG on the other hand opposes this petition on the ground that during investigation Muhammad Tanvir petitioner was found innocent as he was not present at the spot at the time of occurrence. Sofar as the other petitioners Muhammad Jafar and Sikandar are concerned there is general allegation against them that they caused injuries to the injured who has no motive to falsely involve them in this case and keeping in view this situation the petitioners are not entitled for grant of pre-arrest bail.

4. Perusal of the record shows that though the petitioners are named in the F.I.R. but there is general allegation against them for causing injuries to the injured person. So far as their litigation is concerned that is admitted in the F.I.R. According to the medico legal report no injury has been declared as grievous. One of the petitioners namely Muhammad Tanvir has been found innocent during investigation and the version given in the F.I.R. also does not appear to be in line with the medical evidence because the injured has received only three injuries which creates doubt in the version of the complainant as according to him he received so many injuries. The petitioners have joined the investigation and are not required by the police any further. The case of the petitioners falls within the purview of further inquiry and sending them to jail at this stage would not serve any useful purpose to the prosecution. Hence this petition is accepted and ad interim pre-arrest bail already granted to the petitioners vide orders, dated 30-9-2008 is hereby confirmed subject to their furnishing fresh bail bonds in the sum of Rs.50,000 each with one surety each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Deputy Registrar (Judicial) of this Court. H.B.T./M-441/L Bail confirmed.