1989 PLP 4024 (MLD)
ALLAH REHAM‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent
| Citation | 1989 PLP 4024 (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Sardar Muhammad Dogar and Riaz Ahmad JJ |
| Parties | ALLAH REHAM‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1989 PLP 4024 (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1989 PLP 4024 (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Sardar Muhammad Dogar and Riaz Ahmad JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1989 PLP 4024 (MLD) (ALLAH REHAM‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Khalid Farooq Qureshi for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑S. 497‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 409‑‑Bail, grant of‑‑Accused allegedly misappropriated some amount from account of complainant‑‑Complainant admitting to have received amount and not insisting on allegation levelled against accused‑‑Case of further inquiry‑‑Bail allowed in circumstances. Muhammad Iqbal Khichi, AA.‑G. for the State.
Judgment & Decree
RIAZ AHMAD, J.‑‑ The petitioner has been arrested in the case registered against him and others under section 409, P.P.C. at Police Station. Kotwali, District Sialkot.
2. The allegation levelled in the F.I.R. is that the petitioner had misappropriated/embezzled a sum of Rs.52,000 from the account of Mst. Niamat Bibi, in the Kotli Loharan Post Office Branch. Mst. Niamat Bibi after the registration of case made statement before a Magistrate on 29‑11‑1988 (a copy of which has been produced by learned counsel for the petitioner during arguments) that the amount deposited by her in the Post Office Branch, has been received by her. At the best, it can be said for the State that Mst. Niamat Bibi has compromised. Be that as it may, the fact remains that she is not insisting on the allegation levelled against the petitioner. In the circumstances, a case for further enquiry, therefore, appears to have been made out. This petition is, therefore, allowed. The petitioner shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes bail bond in the sum of Rs.1,10,000 (Rs. one lac ten thousand only) with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Assistant Commissioner, Sialkot. S.A./A‑697/L Bail allowed.