SCMR 1990

1990 PLP 201(1) (SCMR)

DIN MUHAMMAD — Appellant Versus ABDUL HAQ Respondent

Jurisdiction / Court
High Court
Decided Date
Civil Appeal No. 18-Q of 1986, decided on 1st June, 1989.
Honorable Judges
Abdul Kadir Shaikh and Zaffar Hussain Mirza, JJ
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1990 PLP 201(1) (SCMR)
Forum / Court High Court
Bench Members Abdul Kadir Shaikh and Zaffar Hussain Mirza, JJ
Parties DIN MUHAMMAD — Appellant Versus ABDUL HAQ Respondent
Primary Law Constitution of Pakistan (1973), ORDER
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1990 PLP 201(1) (SCMR)?

This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973), ORDER as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1990 PLP 201(1) (SCMR)?

The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Abdul Kadir Shaikh and Zaffar Hussain Mirza, JJ.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1990 PLP 201(1) (SCMR) (DIN MUHAMMAD — Appellant Versus ABDUL HAQ Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Constitution of Pakistan (1973) ORDER

Representation

  • Azizullah Memon Advocate of Supreme Court for Appellant.
  • Date of hearing: Ist June, 1989.
  • ---Art.185---Appeal dismissed as withdrawn by permission of Court---Assistance of Advocates to whom notice was issued to appear as amicus curiae, being no longer required, Supreme Court expressed due appreciation to them, for having fully prepared themselves with the case-law.
  • Iftikhar Muhammad, Advocate-on-Record. Basharatullah, Advocate Supreme Court and M. Zaffar, Advocate Supreme Court: Amicus curiae.
  • Since the appeal stands dismissed, the assistance of M/s Iftikhar Mohammad, Basharatullah and M. Zaffar, advocates to whom notice was issued to appear as amicus curiae is no longer necessary, although they have fully prepared themselves with the case-law for which our appreciation is due to them.

Headnotes / Summary

(On appeal from the judgment/order of Balochistan High Court Quetta dated 8th June, 1985 in C. Rev. No. 11 of 1984).

Art.185

Appeal dismissed as withdrawn by permission of Court

Assistance of Advocates to whom notice was issued to appear as amicus curiae, being no longer required, Supreme Court expressed due appreciation to them, for having fully prepared themselves with the case-law. Iftikhar Muhammad, Advocate-on-Record. Basharatullah, Advocate Supreme Court and M. Zaffar, Advocate Supreme Court: Amicus curiae.

Judgment & Decree

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)

Art.185

Appeal dismissed as withdrawn by permission of Court

Assistance of Advocates to whom notice was issued to appear as amicus curiae, being no longer required, Supreme Court expressed due appreciation to them, for having fully prepared themselves with the case-law. Azizullah Memon Advocate of Supreme Court for Appellant. Iftikhar Muhammad, Advocate-on-Record. Basharatullah, Advocate Supreme Court and M. Zaffar, Advocate Supreme Court: Amicus curiae. Date of hearing: Ist June, 1989. ABDUL KADIR SHAIKH, J.--Mr. Azizullah Memon, learned counsel for appellant has filed an application praying for grant of permission to withdraw the appeal. The request is granted and the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs. Since the appeal stands dismissed, the assistance of M/s Iftikhar Mohammad, Basharatullah and M. Zaffar, advocates to whom notice was issued to appear as amicus curiae is no longer necessary, although they have fully prepared themselves with the case-law for which our appreciation is due to them. A.A./D-52/S Appeal dismissed.