1989 PLP 396 (SCMR)
NOOR HASSAN — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 1989 PLP 396 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Haleem, CJ., Abdul Kadir Sheikh and Shajur Rahman, JJ |
| Parties | NOOR HASSAN — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1989 PLP 396 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1989 PLP 396 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Muhammad Haleem, CJ., Abdul Kadir Sheikh and Shajur Rahman, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1989 PLP 396 (SCMR) (NOOR HASSAN — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Sardar Muhammad Ishaque, Advocate Supreme Court and MA. I. Qarni, Advocate:-on-Record for Petitioner.
- Date of hearing: 22nd August, 1988. ,
- Sardar Muhammad Ishaque, Advocate Supreme Court and MA. I. Qarni, Advocate:‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
- Abdul Ghafoor Mangi, Assistant Advocate‑General Sind aril S.M. Abbas, Advocate‑on‑Record for the State.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the judgment and order dated 30-6-1988 of the High Court of Sind at Karachi to Criminal Bail Application No 607 of 1988). Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
S. 497--Bail--Co-accused were liven benefit of bail on the basis of medical evidence--Accused's case was found distinguishable due to the part ascribed to him--Discretion exercised by High Court in refusing ,bail to accused was not interfered with. Abdul Ghafoor Mangi, Assistant Advocate-General Sind aril S.M. Abbas, Advocate-on-Record for the State.
Judgment & Decree
Sardar Muhammad Ishaque, Advocate Supreme Court and MA. I. Qarni, Advocate:‑on‑Record for Petitioner. Abdul Ghafoor Mangi, Assistant Advocate‑General Sind aril S.M. Abbas, Advocate‑on‑Record for the State. Date of hearing: 22nd August, 1988. , MUHAMMAD HALEEM, C.J.‑‑Noor Hassan, alongwith Fazal Chang, Khamiso and Lakhoo, was booked for the murder of Fazal Rahu. The prosecution case is that except for Fazal Chang, who was armed with hatchet, the others were empty‑handed, and the role assigned to them was that after Fatal Chang had caused the hatchet blows to Fatal Rahu, they instigated him to finish him off and also snatched the hatchet from the complainant who had caught hold of its handle. The learned counsel contends that the case of Noor Hassan is on the same footing as Khamiso and Lakhoo, who have been granted bail. But that is not so as they were given the benefit on the basis of the medical evidence Having examined the case and the part ascribed to Noor Hassan, we do not see any justification to interfere with the discretion exercised by the High Court in refusing bail to him. The retition is, accordingly, dismissed. M.A.K./N‑110/S Petition dismissed.