1994 P Cr (PLP)
LIAQAT ALI and others — Appellants Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 1994 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | LIAQAT ALI and others — Appellants Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1994 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1994 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1994 P Cr (PLP) (LIAQAT ALI and others — Appellants Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Khawaja Sultan Ahmad for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 426
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.302/34 & 307/34
Neither any injury to the deceased had been ascribed to the accused nor any recovery of incriminating article had been effected from him
Trial Court had even disbelieved the set out motive ascribed to co-accused-- Accused was stated to be of advanced age with failing health
Lapse of statutory period contemplated by S.426, Cr.P.C. was also pleaded
Sentence awarded to accused by Trial Court was suspended in circumstances and he was allowed bail accordingly.
Judgment & Decree
S. 426
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.302/34 & 307/34
Neither any injury to the deceased had been ascribed to the accused nor any recovery of incriminating article had been effected from him
Trial Court had even disbelieved the set out motive ascribed to co-accused-- Accused was stated to be of advanced age with failing health
Lapse of statutory period contemplated by S.426, Cr.P.C. was also pleaded
Sentence awarded to accused by Trial Court was suspended in circumstances and he was allowed bail accordingly. Khawaja Sultan Ahmad for Petitioner. Asghar Ahmad Kharal for the State. Date of hearing 5th July, 1994. Painda Khan petitioner amongst others having been convicted and sentenced under section 302/34, P.P.C. to imprisonment for life on two counts concurrently under section 307/34, P.P.C. to 10 years' R.I. likewise with a fine of Rs.5,000 on each count, or in default to serve another term of 2 years' R.I. in the event of recovery to be paid to the injured P.Ws. in equal shares as compensation, by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Gujrat vide the impugned judgment, dated 26-4-1992, has presently sought suspension thereof on the ground that neither any injury to the deceased has been ascribed to him nor any recovery of incriminating article has been effected from him, even the set out motive ascribed to the co-accused stands disbelieved by the learned trial Court and advanced age with failing health coupled with the lapse of statutory period-contemplated by section 426, Cr.P.C. According to the request in view of the submissions, petitioner is allowed bail upon furnishing bond in the sum of Rs.50,000 (Rupees fifty thousand only) with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of A.C., Gujrat. N.H.Q./L-82/L Sentence suspended.