1986 PLP 2205 (MLD)
Before Muhammad Zahoorul Haq and Ibadat Yar Khan, JJ Versus GOVERNMENT OF SIND and others‑‑Respondents
| Citation | 1986 PLP 2205 (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Zahoorul Haq and Ibadat Yar Khan, JJ |
| Parties | Before Muhammad Zahoorul Haq and Ibadat Yar Khan, JJ Versus GOVERNMENT OF SIND and others‑‑Respondents |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1986 PLP 2205 (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1986 PLP 2205 (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: Muhammad Zahoorul Haq and Ibadat Yar Khan, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1986 PLP 2205 (MLD) (Before Muhammad Zahoorul Haq and Ibadat Yar Khan, JJ Versus GOVERNMENT OF SIND and others‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Akhlaq Ahmed Siddiqui, Abdul Hafiz Lakho, T.I. Suleman, Syed Sami Ahmed, Umer Farooq Khan, A. T. Mahmood, Zafar Iqbal and Maqsood Baig for Petitioner.
- Ibrahim Memon, Addl. A.‑G. for Respondents.
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑Art.199‑‑Court informed by Government that Home Department was entertaining bail applications of petitioners who sought bail and was willing to enquire into claims of petitioners who claimed to be citizens of Pakistan‑‑In view of such statement petitioners requested to be permitted to withdraw petitions with permission to refile same if needed‑ Petitions allowed to be withdrawn with permission to refile same in case it was needed.
Judgment & Decree
IBADAT YAR KHAN, J.‑--Mr. Ibrahim, Additional Advocate -General states that the Home Department of the Government of Sind is entertaining the bail applications in respect of those petitioners who want to seek bail. He had further stated that the Home Department is willing to enquire into the claims of those of the petitioners who claim to be the citizen of Pakistan and their cases will be dealt with on the basis of the evidence available. In case any one of the petitioners finds the difficulty in having his bail application entertained the Advocate‑General Office would be willing to forward the said application which position has been clarified by Mr. Ibrahim Memon, Additional Advocate‑General. On the basis of the statement made by Additional Advocate General the petitioner counsel do not wish to press these petitions at this stage and request permission to withdraw the same with a reservation that if need be they would be allowed to file a fresh petition. We allow this request and dismiss the petitions as not pressed at this stage The petitioners would be competent to make fresh petition in case it is necessitated. H.A.K. Petitions withdrawn.