PCRLJ 2004

2004 P Cr (PLP)

RIAZ AHMED — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Jurisdiction / Court
Karachi
Decided Date
2004-March-24
Honorable Judges
N/A
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 2004 P Cr (PLP)
Forum / Court Karachi
Bench Members N/A
Parties RIAZ AHMED — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2004 P Cr (PLP)?

This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2004 P Cr (PLP)?

The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: N/A.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 2004 P Cr (PLP) (RIAZ AHMED — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Headnotes / Summary

S. 497

Control of Narcotic Substances Act (XXV of 1997), S.9(b)-- Bail, grant of

Accused had alleged that due to enmity with police, he had been falsely implicated in the crime

State counsel, in view of small quantity of Charas recovered from accused which was 130 grams, and other facts, did not oppose bail application filed by accused

Accused was admitted to bail, in circumstances.

Judgment & Decree

Shafi Muhammad Memon for Applicant. Anwar Ansari for the State.

1. Granted.

2. Applicant Riaz Ahmed is accused in Crime No. 17 of 2004, Police Station Kotri, District Dadu, for commission of offence punishable under section 9-B of Control of Narcotic Substances Act, 1997. According to the prosecution story, in presence of police Mashirs 130 grams Charas was recovered from the applicant on 5-2-2004 when he was apprehended by the police. Learned counsel contends that due to enmity with the police the" applicant has been falsely implicated in the crime. Mr. Anwar Ansari learned State Counsel looking to the quantity of Charas recovered from the applicant and other facts and circumstances candidly did not oppose this bail application. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case; Grounds Nos.5 to 7 urged in the bail application, and by consent, the applicant is admitted to bail on his furnishing surety in the sum of Rs.25,000 and P.R. bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court. H.B.T./R-22/K Bail granted.