1984 PLP 1079 (SCMR)
Raja MUHAMMAD FEROZUDDIN-Petitioner Versus ABDUL QAYYUM AND ANOTHER-Respondents
| Citation | 1984 PLP 1079 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | Raja MUHAMMAD FEROZUDDIN-Petitioner Versus ABDUL QAYYUM AND ANOTHER-Respondents |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1984 PLP 1079 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1984 PLP 1079 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1984 PLP 1079 (SCMR) (Raja MUHAMMAD FEROZUDDIN-Petitioner Versus ABDUL QAYYUM AND ANOTHER-Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Sh. Zafar Mahmood, Advocate Supreme Court and Khan Imtiaz Muhammad Khan, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner.
- Nemo for Respondents.
- Date of hearing :12th November, 1983.
- Sh. Zafar Mahmood, Advocate Supreme Court and Khan Imtiaz Muhammad Khan, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the judgment of Peshawar High Court, Abbottabad Bench, dated 3rd September, 1983 in Cr. A. No. 36 of 1981). -Art. 185(3)-Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 427, 434 & 447 Sentence-Enhancement-Refusal by High Court to enhance sentence of R. I. and fine-No justification found for interference-Judgment of High Court not suffering from any legal infirmity-Leave to appeal refused.
Judgment & Decree
‑Art. 185(3)‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 427, 434 & 447 Sentence‑Enhancement‑Refusal by High Court to enhance sentence of R. I. and fine‑No justification found for interference‑Judgment of High Court not suffering from any legal infirmity‑Leave to appeal refused. Sh. Zafar Mahmood, Advocate Supreme Court and Khan Imtiaz Muhammad Khan, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner. Nemo for Respondents. Date of hearing :12th November, 1983. MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH J.‑Refusal by the Peshawar High Courts to enhance the sentence of R. I and fine in a case under sections 427,4 and 447, P. P. C. and further reduction by it of sentence of R. I. to be already undergone (less than a fortnight), has been brought under challenge in this petition for leave to appeal. After hearing the learned counsel at length on the question of sentence; we have not been able to find any justification for interference. The impugned judgment does not suffer from any legal infirmity; nor it suffers from any infirmity on the basis of any principle. The petition accordingly is dismissed. S. Q Petition dismissed.