SCMR 1989

1989 PLP 1484 (SCMR)

ZULFIQAR and 12 others Petitioners Versus GULZAR AHMAD alias LALA and 2 others Respondents

Jurisdiction / Court
High Court
Decided Date
Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No.719 of 1985, decided on 28th March, 1989.
Honorable Judges
Muhammad Afzal Zullah and Saad Saood Jan, JJ
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1989 PLP 1484 (SCMR)
Forum / Court High Court
Bench Members Muhammad Afzal Zullah and Saad Saood Jan, JJ
Parties ZULFIQAR and 12 others Petitioners Versus GULZAR AHMAD alias LALA and 2 others Respondents
Primary Law Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1989 PLP 1484 (SCMR)?

This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1989 PLP 1484 (SCMR)?

The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Muhammad Afzal Zullah and Saad Saood Jan, JJ.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1989 PLP 1484 (SCMR) (ZULFIQAR and 12 others Petitioners Versus GULZAR AHMAD alias LALA and 2 others Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑

Representation

  • Abid Nawaz, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioners.
  • Nemo for Respondents
  • Date of hearing: 28th March, 1989.

Headnotes / Summary

(On appeal from the order, dated 30th April, 1985 of the Lahore High Court, in R.SA. No.155 of 1982). ‑‑‑Art.185(3)‑‑Petition for leave to appeal‑‑Question involved in the case whether High Court could (or should) not have permitted the conversion of Regular Second Appeal into., Civil Revision stood decided by Supreme Court in the case of Karamat Hussain v. Muhammad Zaman P L D 1987 S C 319 which was in favour of the petitioners‑‑Leave to appeal was granted.

Judgment & Decree

MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH, J.‑‑Leave to appeal has been sought by the defendants' side in a suit for declaration, against the dismissal by the High Court, of their Regular Second Appeal which had arisen out of respondents' suit for declaration. The question involved in this case whether the High Court could (and should) not have permitted the conversion of the Regular Second Appeal into a Civil Revision stands decided by this Court in the case of 'Karamat Hussain and others v. Muhammad Zaman and others' (P L D 1987 S C 319) which goes in favour of the petitioner. Leave to appeal accordingly, is granted. No security. The appeal shall be prepared on its present record with direction two the parties to file all additional documents which would be necessary for disposal of appeal, and, it shall be fixed for hearing during the next session. M.B.A./Z‑60/S Leave granted.