1981 PLP 761 (CLC)
Petitioner Versus MAQBOOL AHMAD‑Respondent
| Citation | 1981 PLP 761 (CLC) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | Z. C. Valliani, J |
| Parties | Petitioner Versus MAQBOOL AHMAD‑Respondent |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1981 PLP 761 (CLC)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1981 PLP 761 (CLC)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: Z. C. Valliani, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1981 PLP 761 (CLC) (Petitioner Versus MAQBOOL AHMAD‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Maroof All Khan for Petitioner.
- Abdul Matin Khan for Respondent.
- Date of hearing: 2nd December 198
Headnotes / Summary
(a) West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance (VI of 1959)‑ ‑‑ S. 13(2)(vi)‑Requirement for reconstruction‑Bona fides and good faith‑Landlord seeking eviction for reconstruction‑Landlord stating shop to be Katcha, in dangerous condition requiring reconstruction and also producing approved plan of Municipality‑Bona fides and good faith held to be presumed for purpose of S. 13(2)(vi). Amir Din‑Allah Ditta v. Adamji Abdullah 1969 S C M R 131; Hasan Ali v. Ahmad Khan P L D 1960 Kar. 23 ; Maula Dad v. Sardar Khan P L D 1972 Quetta 39 and Hamidullah v. State 1980 S C M R 206 ref. Zakaria Bros, Karachi v. Hushwani Sales and Services Ltd., Karachi P L D 1978 Kar. 581 ref. (b) West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance (VI of 1959)‑ ‑‑ S. 13(2)(vi)‑Reconstruction‑Funds and resources for‑Landlord not mentioning either in application or his deposition about availability of means and resources for reconstruction‑Held, question of availability of funds and resources in modern times has no bearing and effect on bona fides and good faith of landlord‑Held further, such condition also not laid down in S. 13(2)(vi).
Judgment & Decree
(a) West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance (VI of 1959)‑ ‑‑ S. 13(2)(vi)‑Requirement for reconstruction‑Bona fides and good faith‑Landlord seeking eviction for reconstruction‑Landlord stating shop to be Katcha, in dangerous condition requiring reconstruction and also producing approved plan of Municipality‑Bona fides and good faith held to be presumed for purpose of S. 13(2)(vi). Amir Din‑Allah Ditta v. Adamji Abdullah 1969 S C M R 131; Hasan Ali v. Ahmad Khan P L D 1960 Kar. 23 ; Maula Dad v. Sardar Khan P L D 1972 Quetta 39 and Hamidullah v. State 1980 S C M R 206 ref. Zakaria Bros, Karachi v. Hushwani Sales and Services Ltd., Karachi P L D 1978 Kar. 581 ref. (b) West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance (VI of 1959)‑ ‑‑ S. 13(2)(vi)‑Reconstruction‑Funds and resources for‑Landlord not mentioning either in application or his deposition about availability of means and resources for reconstruction‑Held, question of availability of funds and resources in modern times has no bearing and effect on bona fides and good faith of landlord‑Held further, such condition also not laid down in S. 13(2)(vi). Maroof All Khan for Petitioner. Abdul Matin Khan for Respondent. Date of hearing: 2nd December 198