1983 PLP 63 (SCMR)
MUHAMMAD IBRAHIM AND ANOTHER-Appellants Versus ILAM DIN AND ANOTHER — Respondents
| Citation | 1983 PLP 63 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD IBRAHIM AND ANOTHER-Appellants Versus ILAM DIN AND ANOTHER — Respondents |
| Primary Law | Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation (Act (XXVIII of 1958) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1983 PLP 63 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation (Act (XXVIII of 1958) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1983 PLP 63 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1983 PLP 63 (SCMR) (MUHAMMAD IBRAHIM AND ANOTHER-Appellants Versus ILAM DIN AND ANOTHER — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Muhammad Naazar Khan, Advocate-on-Record for Appellants.
- S. Inayat Hussain, Advocate-on-Record for Respondent No. 1.
- Date of hearing : 3rd May, 1982.
- Muhammad Naazar Khan, Advocate‑on‑Record for Appellants.
- S. Inayat Hussain, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondent No. 1.
Headnotes / Summary
(Against the judgment of the Lahore High Court. dated 23-I1-1973, passed in Writ Petit[or< No: 754-R(66). -- S. 2(4) read with Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 199--Writ jurisdiction-Finding of High Court in writ jurisdiction as to property in question being a separate shop and not Deorhi based on and supported by Municipal record pertaining to a period much before Partition of subcontinent, held, not open to question. Respondent No. 2 : Ex parte.
Judgment & Decree
ASLAM RIAZ HUSSAIN, J.‑This appeal is directed by Leave of the Court against the judgment of the High Court, dated 23‑11‑1973 in a settlement matter. 2 We have heard the learned counsel for the appellant at length. The only question on which the case turns is whether the property bearing No. 3/413, situated on Hakim Khadim Ali Road, Sialkot City, was merely a deori or a separate shop. The High Court declared it as a separate shop vide the impugned judgment. Leave was granted to consider the correctness of the same. A perusal of the municipal record, 'pertaining to year 194 shows that, this property was treated as a separate shop even before the Partition and was assessed accordingly. The High Court was justified for taking the aforementioned view. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed as being without merit. Appeal dismissed.