1994 P Cr (PLP)
AMANAT ALI and others — Petitioners Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 1994 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Falak Sher, |
| Parties | AMANAT ALI and others — Petitioners Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1994 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1994 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Falak Sher,.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1994 P Cr (PLP) (AMANAT ALI and others — Petitioners Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Sardar Muhammad Latif Khan Khosa for Petitioners.
- Date of hearing: 9th January, 1994.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 497(2)
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 302/324/34
No specific injury was ascribed to the accused who had allegedly made the proverbial Lalkara and ineffective firing subsequent to the occurrence-- Challan having been submitted in the Court accused was no more required by the investigating agency
Sufficient grounds; thus, existed for further inquiry into the guilt of accused
Accused was allowed bail in circumstances. Muhammad Riaz Lone for the State.
Judgment & Decree
S. 497(2)
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 302/324/34
No specific injury was ascribed to the accused who had allegedly made the proverbial Lalkara and ineffective firing subsequent to the occurrence-- Challan having been submitted in the Court accused was no more required by the investigating agency
Sufficient grounds; thus, existed for further inquiry into the guilt of accused
Accused was allowed bail in circumstances. Sardar Muhammad Latif Khan Khosa for Petitioners. Muhammad Riaz Lone for the State. Date of hearing: 9th January, 1994. Bail was sought in the case registered vide F.I.R. No.116 of 11-5-1993 under section 302/324/34, P.P.C. at Police Station Gogera, District Okara alleging launching of murderous assault on the complainant's sons Muhammad Ramzan and Munir Ahmad, deceased and injured respectively while staking the reaped crop, by the petitioners and co-accused Gulzar equipped with pistol and .7 mm rifles respectively; on Amanat Ali's exhortation to teach a lesson for being a witness in the assault case of their immediate relations. Hussain petitioner fired rifle shot landing on Munir Ahmad's right upper arm as a consequence whereof he collapsed on the ground at which juncture his brother Muhammad Ramzan deceased endeavoured to intervene whereupon he too was fired at by Gulzar co-accused in the back to which he succumbed on the spot, subsequent whereof the assailants vanished away under Amanat Ali's ineffective fire cover.
2. During the course of hearing whereof learned counsel opting not to press the petition qua Muhammad Hussain confined his submissions to Amanat Ali contending non-ascription of any specific injury save for the proverbial Lalkara and ineffective firing subsequent to the occurrence and with the submission of challan is no more required by the investigating agency; factum whereof remained uncontroverted by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State though otherwise joining the contest, which prima facie constitutes sufficient grounds for further enquiring into his involvement in the offence charged.
3. Consequently dismissing ' Muhammad Hussain's petition as not pressed, Amanat Ali is allowed bail upon furnishing bond in the sum of Rs.50,000 with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court. N.H.Q./A-579/L Bail allowed.