1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))
AYUB HASSAN Versus GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB
| Citation | 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) |
| Forum / Court | Supreme Court of Pakistan |
| Bench Members | Abdul Shakural Salam, Rustam S. Sidhwa and Muhammad Afzal Lone, JJ |
| Parties | AYUB HASSAN Versus GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB |
| Primary Law | (a) Civil service, (b) Civil service |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
This judgment primarily cites: (a) Civil service, (b) Civil service as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan bench comprising: Abdul Shakural Salam, Rustam S. Sidhwa and Muhammad Afzal Lone, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) (AYUB HASSAN Versus GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Mr. Shamsi, Advocate Supreme Court and Ejaz Ahmad Khan, Advocate-on-Record for Appellant.
- Abdul Maajid Sheikh, Advocate Supreme Court and Rao Muhammad Yousaf Khan, Advocate-on-Record (absent) for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 30th July, 1991.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the judgment, dated 19-4-1983 of the Punjab Service Tribunal, in Appeal No.175/1619 of 1982).
Civil servant's retirement on the ground of his having completed twenty-five years of service qualifying for pension and other retirement benefits
Had civil servant not been retired he would have retired on superannuation
Civil servant's service under the Central Government could not be tagged with his service under the Provincial Government
Order of civil servant's retirement by including in his service, the period of his service under the Central Government being not warranted by law, order of his retirement was set aside.
Civil servant's retirement after completion of twenty-five years of service qualifying for pension and other retirement benefits-- Provincial Government while passing impugned order of civil servant's retirement had included in his service record the period of his service under the Central Government
Service under the Central Government could not be tagged with service under the Provincial Government
Civil servant's order of retirement being not valid was set aside.
Judgment & Decree
(On appeal from the judgment, dated 19-4-1983 of the Punjab Service Tribunal, in Appeal No.175/1619 of 1982). (a) Civil service
Civil servant's retirement on the ground of his having completed twenty-five years of service qualifying for pension and other retirement benefits
Had civil servant not been retired he would have retired on superannuation
Civil servant's service under the Central Government could not be tagged with his service under the Provincial Government
Order of civil servant's retirement by including in his service, the period of his service under the Central Government being not warranted by law, order of his retirement was set aside. (b) Civil service
Civil servant's retirement after completion of twenty-five years of service qualifying for pension and other retirement benefits-- Provincial Government while passing impugned order of civil servant's retirement had included in his service record the period of his service under the Central Government
Service under the Central Government could not be tagged with service under the Provincial Government
Civil servant's order of retirement being not valid was set aside. Mr. Shamsi, Advocate Supreme Court and Ejaz Ahmad Khan, Advocate-on-Record for Appellant. Abdul Maajid Sheikh, Advocate Supreme Court and Rao Muhammad Yousaf Khan, Advocate-on-Record (absent) for Respondents. Date of hearing: 30th July, 1991.