1994SCMR1863 (PLP)
Hafiz NOOR MUHAMMAD and others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus GHULAM RASOOL and others‑‑‑Respondents
| Citation | 1994SCMR1863 (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Supreme Court of Pakistan |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | Hafiz NOOR MUHAMMAD and others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus GHULAM RASOOL and others‑‑‑Respondents |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1994SCMR1863 (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1994SCMR1863 (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1994SCMR1863 (PLP) (Hafiz NOOR MUHAMMAD and others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus GHULAM RASOOL and others‑‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Muhammad Zainul Abidin, Advocate Supreme Court and Tanvir Ahmad, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioners.
- Nemo for Respondents.
Judgment & Decree
‑‑‑‑S. 2(2)‑‑‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 185 (3)‑‑‑Leave to appeal was granted to examine whether plot in question, could at all be treated as residential property. Muhammad Zainul Abidin, Advocate Supreme Court and Tanvir Ahmad, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioners. Nemo for Respondents. Date of hearing: 25th October, 1993. SHAFIUR RAHMAN, J.‑‑‑Leave to appeal is granted to examine whether the plot in dispute could at all be treated as residual property. The parties shall be free to file attested copies of the settlement record in support of their respective case. The plan of the property filed today shall be placed on record. Status quo meanwhile. A. A. /N-377/S Leave granted.