2007 P Cr (PLP)
MUHAMMAD SHOAIB ANWAR — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 2007 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD SHOAIB ANWAR — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2007 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2007 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2007 P Cr (PLP) (MUHAMMAD SHOAIB ANWAR — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Headnotes / Summary
S. 497(2)
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.489-F
Challan having been submitted, accused was not required for further inquiry by the Investigating agency
First Information Report showed that, case for bail was made out
Case of accused having come within the ambit of further inquiry under subsection (2) of S.497, Cr. P. C. , concession of bail was extended to him.
Judgment & Decree
MRS. QAISAR IQBAL, J.
Applicant Muhammad Shoaib Anwar son of Syed Anwar Hussain has applied for bail.. in Crime No. l l of 2007 under section 489-F, P.P.C. registered at Police Station Joherabad, Karachi. Precisely the facts leading to the case are that complainant Mirza Shahzad Ali lodged report that applicant has borrowed Rs.4,00,000 from him and had agreed to pay on 12th July, 2006. On instance of the complainant cheque drawn on Soneri Bank Hassan Mansion F.B. Area Branch in the sum of Rs.4,00,000 was issued which was presented to bank and was dishonoured for want of cash. Mr. Saleem Hussain Shah learned counsel -for applicant has contended that the applicant has been involved in the charged offence due to civil liability arising out of lending of loan by the complainant. He was arrested on 21-2-2007 connected in the commission of the charged offence. The charge-sheet has been submitted and the case has been set on trial. Mr. Fazlur Rehman Awan learned State Counsel has conceded to the above facts and contended that the offence with which the applicant is charged does not fall within the prohibitory clause contained in section 497, Cr.P.C. Having considered the .facts and circumstances of the case more particularly when the challan has been submitted, the applicant is not required for further inquiry by the Investigating Agency. From the contents oi' First Information Report, case of bail is made out. I hereby extend the concession of bail to the applicant as his case comes within A the ambit of further inquiry contained in subsection (2) of section 497,. Cr.P.C. The applicant is admitted to bail subject to furnishing solvent surety in the sum of Rs.50,000 (Rupees fifty thousand only) and P.R. bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court. H.B.T./M-104/K????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? Bail granted.