1989 PLP 1716 (SCMR)
Mst. INAYAT BEGUM and another‑‑Petitioners Versus MUHAMMAD BOOTA and others Respondents
| Citation | 1989 PLP 1716 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Afzal Zullah and Javid Iqbal, JJ |
| Parties | Mst. INAYAT BEGUM and another‑‑Petitioners Versus MUHAMMAD BOOTA and others Respondents |
| Primary Law | Transfer of Property Act (IV of 1882)‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1989 PLP 1716 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Transfer of Property Act (IV of 1882)‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1989 PLP 1716 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Muhammad Afzal Zullah and Javid Iqbal, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1989 PLP 1716 (SCMR) (Mst. INAYAT BEGUM and another‑‑Petitioners Versus MUHAMMAD BOOTA and others Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Kh. Muhammad Farooq, Advocate Supreme Court and S.Inayat Hussain, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioners.
- Sh. Ghias Muhammad, Senior Advocate Supreme Court and Ch. Mehdi Khan Mchtab, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondent No.l.
- Date of hearing: 19th July, 1988.
Headnotes / Summary
(Against the judgment and order of the Lahore High Court, Lahore, dated 3‑11‑1981 in R.S.A. No. 215 of 1976). ‑‑‑S.54‑‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 185(3)‑‑Sale‑‑Petitioners reiterated points which were raised before High Court which had properly been dealt with‑ All the three Courts had rendered findings of fact against the petitioners‑‑No justification for interference had been made out‑‑Leave to appeal was refused.
Judgment & Decree
MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH, J.‑‑Leave to appeal has been sought by defendants side in a suit regarding sale of property against the dismissal of their Regular Second Appeal by the High Court. The respondents side had filed a ‑suit regarding sale of property belonging to Mst. Alam Bibi, by Madad Ali petitioner No. 2 in the capacity of her General Attorney in favour of his own wife, Mst. Inayat Begum, petitioner No.
1. It was alleged to be a fraudulent transaction. The suit was decreed. The petitioners' first and second appeals having failed, they have now sought leave to appeal. Learned counsel has reiterated the points raised before the High Court. They have properly been dealt with. All the three Courts have rendered findings of fact against the petitioners. No justification has been made out for interference. Leave to appeal accordingly is refused. M.A.K./I‑84/S Leave refused.