2007 PLP 401 (YLR)
MUHAMMAD IMRAN and another — Petitioners Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 2007 PLP 401 (YLR) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Asif Saeed Khan Khosa, J |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD IMRAN and another — Petitioners Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2007 PLP 401 (YLR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2007 PLP 401 (YLR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Asif Saeed Khan Khosa, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2007 PLP 401 (YLR) (MUHAMMAD IMRAN and another — Petitioners Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Malik Muhammad Imtiaz Mahl for Petitioners.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 497
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.302, 148 & 149
Two co-accused had already been admitted to post-arrest bail and it was not disputed that as far as allegations levelled against different accused in the F.I.R. were concerned the case against accused, was not dissimilar to or distinguishable from the case against said co-accused
No reason existed as to why accused could not be treated in the matter of bail in the same manner as said co-accused who had been granted bail
Accused were admitted to bail, in circumstances. Ahmad Khan Chathha for the State with Adalat Khan, A.S.-I. with record. Syed Imdad Hussain Hamdani for the Complainant.
Judgment & Decree
ASIF SAEED KHAN KHOSA, J.
Through this petition Muhammad Imran and Umer Draz petitioners have sought post-arrest bail in case F.I.R. No.230 registered at Police Station Jauhar Abad, District Khushab on 25-5-2005 in respect of offences under sections 148/ 302/149, P.P.C.
2. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and going through the record it has straightaway been noticed by me that two co-accused of the present petitioners namely Nazar Hay at and Shaukat Hussain have already been admitted to post-arrest bail by this Court vide order dated 16-11-2005 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No.7798-B of 2005. It is not disputed that as far as the allegations levelled against different accused persons in the F.I.R. are concerned the case against the present petitioners is not dissimilar to or distinguishable from the case against the said co-accused. There is, thus, no reason why the present petitioners may not be treated in the matter of bail in the same manner as the said co-accused. This petition is, therefore, allowed and the petitioners are admitted to bail subject to furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs.50,000 (Rupees fifty thousand only) each with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court. H.B.T./M-240/L Bail granted.