1996 P Cr (PLP)
MUHAMMAD MURAD — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 1996 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD MURAD — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1996 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1996 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1996 P Cr (PLP) (MUHAMMAD MURAD — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Altaf Ibrahim Qureshi for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 497
Penal Code (XLV of 1860). S.302/34
Accused had been reported by the Medical Board to be suffering from bleeding ulcer on lower abdomen with urinary tract infection who needed specialized treatment in a big hospital
Judgment & Decree
S. 497
Penal Code (XLV of 1860). S.302/34
Accused had been reported by the Medical Board to be suffering from bleeding ulcer on lower abdomen with urinary tract infection who needed specialized treatment in a big hospital
Accused was admitted to bail in circumstances. Altaf Ibrahim Qureshi for Petitioner. Sh. Muhammad Ibrahim for the State. The petitioner has applied for bail after arrest in F.I.R. No.81/94, dated 14-4-1994 registered against him and one Azam under section. 302/34, P.P.C. at Police Station. Tibba Sultanpur, District Vehari.
2. This post-arrest bail is moved on the sole ground that the petitioner is suffering from bleeding ulcer on lower abdomen and pathologically having report coinciding with urinary tract infection. He is under need of specialist which is possible in a big hospital having specialist on that point.
3. The learned State counsel also concedes that there is a report of medical board concerning the same.
4. Keeping in view the gravity of offence as well as medical condition of the accused-petitioner, I admit the petitioner to bail in the sum of Rs.2,00,000 with two sureties each of the said amount to the satisfaction of A.C./Duty Magistrate, Mailsi. N.H.Q./M-2008/L Bail allowed