1986 PLP 1062 (SCMR)
YAHYA BAKHTIAR — Petitioner Versus Shaikh SHAUKAT ALI and others — Respondents
| Citation | 1986 PLP 1062 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Haleem, C.J. Muhammad Afzal Zullah, Nasim Hassan Shah, Shafiur Rahman and Zaffar Hussain Mirza, JJ |
| Parties | YAHYA BAKHTIAR — Petitioner Versus Shaikh SHAUKAT ALI and others — Respondents |
| Primary Law | Supreme Court Rules, 1980 |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1986 PLP 1062 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Supreme Court Rules, 1980 as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1986 PLP 1062 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Muhammad Haleem, C.J. Muhammad Afzal Zullah, Nasim Hassan Shah, Shafiur Rahman and Zaffar Hussain Mirza, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1986 PLP 1062 (SCMR) (YAHYA BAKHTIAR — Petitioner Versus Shaikh SHAUKAT ALI and others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Nemo for Petitioner.
- Date of hearing: 1st March, 1986.
Headnotes / Summary
O.XXVII--Contempt--Petitioner failing to deposit amount which was imperative before petition could be entertained by office--Neither amount deposited nor petitioner appearing on date fixed for considering petition on merits--Dispute raised in proceedings not appropriate justiciable issue to be resolved by Court--Petition disposed as not entertain-able. Respondent No.l in person. Nemo for the remaining Respondents.
Judgment & Decree
MUHAMMAD HALEEM, C.J.‑‑There was an office objection that the petitioner had not deposited Rs.500 which was imperative before the petition could be entertained by the office. This matter and also the matter on merits was fixed in Court for orders. Neither the petitioner is present nor has the amount been deposited. Moreover, we do not consider the dispute raised in these proceedings to be an appropriate issue to be resolved by this Court. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of as not being entertainable. M. Y. H. Petition dismissed.