1984 PLP 598 (SCMR)
ALLAH DITTA AND ANOTHER‑Petitioners Versus Mst. KHURSHID BEGUM AND ANOTHER‑Respondents
| Citation | 1984 PLP 598 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | ALLAH DITTA AND ANOTHER‑Petitioners Versus Mst. KHURSHID BEGUM AND ANOTHER‑Respondents |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1984 PLP 598 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1984 PLP 598 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1984 PLP 598 (SCMR) (ALLAH DITTA AND ANOTHER‑Petitioners Versus Mst. KHURSHID BEGUM AND ANOTHER‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Mian Yasin Wattoo, Advocate Supreme Court and Ch. Mehdi Khan Mehtab, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioners.
- Nemo for Respondents.
- Date of hearing : 6th March, 1984.
- After hearing Mian Yasin Watto, Advocate, we feel that he is not in a position to challenge the correctness of the impugned order of the High Court on any cogent ground, His main apprehension, however, seems to be that the alleged detenu Mst. Shamim Begum, who after the order of the High Court, is living with Mst. Khurshid Begum but having illicit relations with one Mumtaz, the brother of the said Mst. Khurshid Begum, cannot be taken into account either by petitioner No. 1, who is the husband of Mst. Shamim Begum, nor her father, petitioner No. 2 herein. In other words, they cannot take any proceedings against Mst. Shamim Begum or her alleged paramour, Mumtaz on account of the order of the High Court dated 13‑11‑r982 passed while disposing of the habeas corpus petition.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the judgment dated 13‑11‑1982 of the Lahore High Court, Lahore in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 486/H of 1982. ‑--Art. 185 (3)‑‑‑Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), S. 491‑Habeas cropus petition‑‑‑High Court allowing detenu S, a married lady, to go with K, another lady‑Petitioner, husband of S, alleging that detenu after order of High Court was living with K but having illicit relations with K's brother who cannot be taken into account because of High Court orders‑Held, orders of High Court could not stand in way of proceedings being taken against any party who may be committing criminal offence‑Petition for leave to appeal dismissed as being entirely misconceived.
Judgment & Decree
NASIM HASAN SHAH, J.‑‑‑The High Court, vide its order dated 13‑11‑1982, accepted the habeas corpus petition tiled by Mst Khurshid Begum, respondent No. l herein and ordered the release of the detenu Mst. Shamim Begum allowing her to go along with List. Khurshid Begum, afore‑mentioned. This is a petition seeking leave to appeal against the said order of the High Court. After hearing Mian Yasin Watto, Advocate, we feel that he is not in a position to challenge the correctness of the impugned order of the High Court on any cogent ground, His main apprehension, however, seems to be that the alleged detenu Mst. Shamim Begum, who after the order of the High Court, is living with Mst. Khurshid Begum but having illicit relations with one Mumtaz, the brother of the said Mst. Khurshid Begum, cannot be taken into account either by petitioner No. 1, who is the husband of Mst. Shamim Begum, nor her father, petitioner No. 2 herein. In other words, they cannot take any proceedings against Mst. Shamim Begum or her alleged paramour, Mumtaz on account of the order of the High Court dated 13‑11‑r982 passed while disposing of the habeas corpus petition. The apprehension of the learned counsel is entirely misconceived. The order of the High Court does not stand in the way of proceedings being taken against any party who may be committing a criminal offence. There is no force in this petition, which is hereby dismissed. M. Z. M. Petition dismissed.