PCRLJ 1994

1994 P Cr (PLP)

KHALID HUSSAIN — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Jurisdiction / Court
Lahore
Decided Date
1993-December-13
Honorable Judges
N/A
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1994 P Cr (PLP)
Forum / Court Lahore
Bench Members N/A
Parties KHALID HUSSAIN — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Primary Law Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1994 P Cr (PLP)?

This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1994 P Cr (PLP)?

The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1994 P Cr (PLP) (KHALID HUSSAIN — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

Representation

  • ----S. 497---Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.465/467/468---Bail, grant of-- Accused being a clerk of an Advocate had allegedly forged the signatures of Tehsildar for fabricating a false domicile certificate---Prosecution so far had not even sent the signatures of the accused to Handwriting Expert to arrive at a positive conclusion that accused in fact did forge the signatures---Accused was behind the bars for the last three months---Accused was released on bail in circumstances.
  • Ch. Mumtaz Ahmad Bhalwana for Petitioner.
  • The allegation against the petitioner is that he being a clerk of an Advocate allegedly forged the signatures of Tehsildar for fabricating a false domicile certificate. So far the prosecution has been so indolent that even the signatures of the petitioner have not been sent to the Handwriting Expert so as to arrive at a positive conclusion that the petitioner in fact did forge the signatures. It is submitted that petitioner is behind the bars for the last three months. In this view of the matter, I direct that the petitioner shall be released on bail subject to his furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs. one hundred thousand (Rs.1,00,000) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of Assistant Commissioner. Bhalwal.

Headnotes / Summary

S. 497

Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.465/467/468

Bail, grant of-- Accused being a clerk of an Advocate had allegedly forged the signatures of Tehsildar for fabricating a false domicile certificate

Prosecution so far had not even sent the signatures of the accused to Handwriting Expert to arrive at a positive conclusion that accused in fact did forge the signatures

Accused was behind the bars for the last three months

Accused was released on bail in circumstances.

Judgment & Decree

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

S. 497

Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.465/467/468

Bail, grant of-- Accused being a clerk of an Advocate had allegedly forged the signatures of Tehsildar for fabricating a false domicile certificate

Prosecution so far had not even sent the signatures of the accused to Handwriting Expert to arrive at a positive conclusion that accused in fact did forge the signatures

Accused was behind the bars for the last three months

Accused was released on bail in circumstances. Ch. Mumtaz Ahmad Bhalwana for Petitioner. M. Saleem Shad for the State. Date of hearing: 13th December, 1993. The allegation against the petitioner is that he being a clerk of an Advocate allegedly forged the signatures of Tehsildar for fabricating a false domicile certificate. So far the prosecution has been so indolent that even the signatures of the petitioner have not been sent to the Handwriting Expert so as to arrive at a positive conclusion that the petitioner in fact did forge the signatures. It is submitted that petitioner is behind the bars for the last three months. In this view of the matter, I direct that the petitioner shall be released on bail subject to his furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs. one hundred thousand (Rs.1,00,000) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of Assistant Commissioner. Bhalwal. N.H.Q./K-122/L Bail granted.