1984 PLP 1414 (SCMR)
Messers SPINZAR SNACKS‑‑Petitioner Versus Mrs. ANJUM A. RAB and another‑‑Respondents
| Citation | 1984 PLP 1414 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Nasim Hasan Shah, S.A.Nusrat and Zaffar Hussain Mirza, JJ |
| Parties | Messers SPINZAR SNACKS‑‑Petitioner Versus Mrs. ANJUM A. RAB and another‑‑Respondents |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1984 PLP 1414 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1984 PLP 1414 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Nasim Hasan Shah, S.A.Nusrat and Zaffar Hussain Mirza, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1984 PLP 1414 (SCMR) (Messers SPINZAR SNACKS‑‑Petitioner Versus Mrs. ANJUM A. RAB and another‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Akhtar Mahmud, Advocate Supreme Court and Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
- K.A.Wahab, Advocate Supreme Court and Faizanul Haq, Advocate‑on Record for Respondent No.l.
- Date of hearing: 16th January, 1984.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the judgment dated 30‑11‑1983 of the High Court of Sind at Karachi in Constitutional P.No.115 of 1981). ‑‑‑Art.185(3)‑‑Sind Rented Premises Ordinance (XVII of 1979), S.15‑ Ejectment‑‑Petition for leave to appeal against ejectment‑‑Parties, towards conclusion of arguments, agreeing to settle their dispute amicably and as a result petitioner‑tenant giving undertaking to vacate premises voluntarily on expiry of eight months‑‑Petition dismissed as not pressed in view of settlement between parties.
Judgment & Decree
Akhtar Mahmud, Advocate Supreme Court and Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner. K.A.Wahab, Advocate Supreme Court and Faizanul Haq, Advocate‑on Record for Respondent No.l. Date of hearing: 16th January, 1984. NASIM HASAN SHAH, J.‑‑ The petitioner, a tenant under respondent No.l, was ordered to be ejected by the order of the District Judge, Karachi, on the appeal of the respondent and his Constitutional Petition directed against the said order of the learned District Judge having failed, hence this petition for leave to appeal. Mr. Akhtar Mahmud, learned counsel for the petitioner, as well as Mr. K.A. Wahab, who appeared in support of the Caveat lodged by respondent No.l, have been heard at some length. Towards the conclusion of the arguments of the learned counsel, the parries agreed to settle their dispute amicably. The petitioner has agreed not to press this petition, provided respondent No. 1 allows him the use and occupation of the premises in dispute for a further period of eight months. The respondent No.l agrees to do so, provided the petitioner gives an undertaking to the effect that he will vacate the premises voluntarily, on the expiry of the aforesaid period of eight months and will not oblige her to resort to take out execution proceed ings. The petitioner has given an undertaking before us that he will voluntarily hand over the possession of the premises to respondent No. l on the expiry of the aforesaid period of 8 months. In view of this settlement between the parties, we would dismiss this petition as not pressed, but the petitioner shall not be ejected from the premises until 16‑9‑1984, provided he pays the agreed rent for the period between 1st January, 1984 to the 15th September, 1984, in lump sum to the land‑lady (respondent No.l) by the 1st February, 1984. The petitioner shall, according to his undertaking given before us, deliver the possession of the premises to respondent No.l voluntarily and peacefully on or before the 16th September, 1984. S.Q. Order accordingly.