CLC 1981

1981 PLP 372 (CLC)

KARACHI‑Plaintiff/Decree‑Holder Versus Mow HAJI MUHAMMAD ISHAQ‑HAJI DOST

Jurisdiction / Court
Karachi
Decided Date
Execution No. 60 of 1974 in Suit No. 965 of 1953, decided on 15th November, 1980.
Honorable Judges
Nasir Aslam Zahid, J
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1981 PLP 372 (CLC)
Forum / Court Karachi
Bench Members Nasir Aslam Zahid, J
Parties KARACHI‑Plaintiff/Decree‑Holder Versus Mow HAJI MUHAMMAD ISHAQ‑HAJI DOST
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1981 PLP 372 (CLC)?

This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1981 PLP 372 (CLC)?

The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: Nasir Aslam Zahid, J.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1981 PLP 372 (CLC) (KARACHI‑Plaintiff/Decree‑Holder Versus Mow HAJI MUHAMMAD ISHAQ‑HAJI DOST). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Representation

  • Date of hearing : 8th November, 1980.

Headnotes / Summary

(a) Limitation Act (1X of 1908)‑ ‑‑ First Sched, Art. 183 [as amended by Law Reforms Ordinance (XII of 1972)] read with Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O. XXI LimitationExecution of decreeAmendment curtailing period of limitation from twelve years to six years‑Not retrospective Decree passed prior to amendment in, 1972 of Article 183‑Period of twelve years previously available, held, continued to be period for execution of such decree notwithstanding execution application having been filed after amendment of 1972.‑[Decree]. Vithal Rao Gopal Rao v. Ramkishan Waman A I R 1961 Bom. 258 ref. National Bank of Pakistan v. Hyderabad Tando Fazal Bux Service 1980 C L C 1.146 rel. (b) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)‑

0. XXI, r. 30‑Execution of decree‑No statutory provision held, places any prohibition or restraint on filing of more than one execution applications for enforcement of decree.‑[Decree]. M. G. Dastgir for the Decree‑Holder. Abdul Sattar Memon for the JudgmentDebt.

Judgment & Decree

(a) Limitation Act (1X of 1908)‑ ‑‑ First Sched, Art. 183 [as amended by Law Reforms Ordinance (XII of 1972)] read with Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O. XXI LimitationExecution of decreeAmendment curtailing period of limitation from twelve years to six years‑Not retrospective Decree passed prior to amendment in, 1972 of Article 183‑Period of twelve years previously available, held, continued to be period for execution of such decree notwithstanding execution application having been filed after amendment of 1972.‑[Decree]. Vithal Rao Gopal Rao v. Ramkishan Waman A I R 1961 Bom. 258 ref. National Bank of Pakistan v. Hyderabad Tando Fazal Bux Service 1980 C L C 1.146 rel. (b) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)‑

0. XXI, r. 30‑Execution of decree‑No statutory provision held, places any prohibition or restraint on filing of more than one execution applications for enforcement of decree.‑[Decree]. M. G. Dastgir for the Decree‑Holder. Abdul Sattar Memon for the JudgmentDebt. Date of hearing : 8th November, 1980.