1968 SCM R 141 (PLP)
S.FARZAND ALI NAQVI-Appellant Versus THE STATE-Respondent
| Citation | 1968 SCM R 141 (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | S. A. Rahman, Fazle-Akbar and Hamoodur Rahman, JJ |
| Parties | S.FARZAND ALI NAQVI-Appellant Versus THE STATE-Respondent |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1968 SCM R 141 (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1968 SCM R 141 (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: S. A. Rahman, Fazle-Akbar and Hamoodur Rahman, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1968 SCM R 141 (PLP) (S.FARZAND ALI NAQVI-Appellant Versus THE STATE-Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Dr. Tasaddque Hussain, Senior Advocate Supreme Court (Faqir Hussain Shah, Advocate Supreme Court with him) instructed by Wajid Hussain, Senior Attorney for Appellant.
- Raja Said Akbar, Advocate-General, West Pakistan (Shamim Ahmad Mirza, Advocate Supreme Court with him) instructed by ljaz Ali, Attorney for Respondent.
- S. A. RAHMAN, J.-Dr. Tasaddaque Hussain appears for the appellant and the learned Advocate-General for the State respondent. It is stated by the latter that the case against the appellant has now reached the defence stage in the Special Judge's Court and that he has no objection to the appellant's continuing on bail till the disposal of that case. The appeal is, therefore, formally allowed. The appellant will continue to remain on bail as already ordered by this Court, during the pendency of the case' against him.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the judgment and order of the High Court of West Pakistan, Lahore, dated the 31st May 1965, in Criminal .4. Miscellaneous Nos. 814 and 815 of 1965). Appeal to Supreme Court-Appeal respecting bail-Appeal accepted formally having not been opposed by state.
Judgment & Decree
S. A. RAHMAN, J.-Dr. Tasaddaque Hussain appears for the appellant and the learned Advocate-General for the State respondent. It is stated by the latter that the case against the appellant has now reached the defence stage in the Special Judge's Court and that he has no objection to the appellant's continuing on bail till the disposal of that case. The appeal is, therefore, formally allowed. The appellant will continue to remain on bail as already ordered by this Court, during the pendency of the case' against him. Appeal accepted.