1984 PLP (C (PLC(CS))
MUHAMMD HASIL Versus PUNJAB LABOUR APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
| Citation | 1984 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore High Court |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Zafarullah, J |
| Parties | MUHAMMD HASIL Versus PUNJAB LABOUR APPELLATE TRIBUNAL |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1984 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1984 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore High Court bench comprising: Muhammad Zafarullah, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1984 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) (MUHAMMD HASIL Versus PUNJAB LABOUR APPELLATE TRIBUNAL). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Ch. Nazir Hussain for Appellant.
- Date of hearing: 17th April, 1983.
Headnotes / Summary
Writ jurisdiction‑ ‑‑Alternate remedy‑Expiry of limitation for appeal before Service Tribunal‑No ground for allowing writ petition,
Judgment & Decree
Revision Application No. 2 of 1983, decided on 17th April, 1993. Writ jurisdiction‑ ‑‑Alternate remedy‑Expiry of limitation for appeal before Service Tribunal‑No ground for allowing writ petition, Ch. Nazir Hussain for Appellant. Date of hearing: 17th April, 1983. The petitioner seeks review of my order on the ground that the rule laid down in the case of Pakistan Television Corporation v. Babar Zaman (1981 P L C 219) has been omitted from consideration. I am afraid, the facts of that case do not relate to the facts of the present case. The petitioner is a road Inspector and in my view he is a civil servant. The learned counsel has, however, argued that the petitioner has no remedy before the Service Tribunal as the period of limitation provided for the appeal before the Service Tribunal has expired. This, however, is no ground for allowing a writ petition and thus conferring a jurisdiction or the Labour Court which otherwise does not vest in them. The petition is dismissed. A. B. Petition dismissed