2007 PLP 128 (MLD)
MUHAMMAD NAVEED — Petitioner Versus CIVIL JUDGE and others — Respondents
| Citation | 2007 PLP 128 (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD NAVEED — Petitioner Versus CIVIL JUDGE and others — Respondents |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2007 PLP 128 (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2007 PLP 128 (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2007 PLP 128 (MLD) (MUHAMMAD NAVEED — Petitioner Versus CIVIL JUDGE and others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- ----Art. 199---Constitutional petition---Counsel for petitioner, instead of pressing his constitutional petition, had submitted that he would seek redress of his grievance by way of filing a complaint---Petition was disposed of accordingly with observations that if a complaint was filed by the petitioner, same would be decided strictly on its own merits and Trial Court would not be influenced by the opinion of the police or by the observation made by Magistrate in his order.
- Ch. Muhammad Ashraf Mohandra for Petitioner.
- Shaheen Masood Rizvi, A.A.-G. with Nasir Ali, Inspector/S.H.O. for Respondents.
Headnotes / Summary
Art. 199
Constitutional petition
Counsel for petitioner, instead of pressing his constitutional petition, had submitted that he would seek redress of his grievance by way of filing a complaint
Petition was disposed of accordingly with observations that if a complaint was filed by the petitioner, same would be decided strictly on its own merits and Trial Court would not be influenced by the opinion of the police or by the observation made by Magistrate in his order.
Judgment & Decree
MUHAMMAD FARRUKH MAHMUD, J.
Instead of pressing this petition the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he would seek redress of his grievance by way of filing a complaint. Disposed of accordingly.
2. In case a complaint is filed by the petitioner the same would be decided strictly on its own merits. The learned Trial Court would not be influenced by the opinion of the police or by the observation made by the learned Magistrate in his order, dated 23-11-2004 as the learned Magistrate has wrongly based his order on the opinion of the arbitrators which practice was not approved by the apex Court in the case of Mst. Bashiran Bibi v. Nisar Ahmad Khan and others (PLD 1990 SC 83). H.B.T./M-501/L Order accordingly.