PLC(CS) 1976

1976 PLP [C (PLC(CS))

M. RASHID KHAN Versus S. E. HIGHWAY CIRCLE

Jurisdiction / Court
1976 P L C C.S.T. 35(1)
Decided Date
Case No. 467 of 1974, decided on 13th November 1974.
Honorable Judges
Sand Saood Jan, Chairman, Ashfaq Ali Khan and Khalid Farooq, Members
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1976 PLP [C (PLC(CS))
Forum / Court 1976 P L C C.S.T. 35(1)
Bench Members Sand Saood Jan, Chairman, Ashfaq Ali Khan and Khalid Farooq, Members
Parties M. RASHID KHAN Versus S. E. HIGHWAY CIRCLE
Primary Law Punjab Administrative Tribunals Act (IX of 1974)‑
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1976 PLP [C (PLC(CS))?

This judgment primarily cites: Punjab Administrative Tribunals Act (IX of 1974)‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1976 PLP [C (PLC(CS))?

The case was heard and decided by the 1976 P L C C.S.T. 35(1) bench comprising: Sand Saood Jan, Chairman, Ashfaq Ali Khan and Khalid Farooq, Members.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1976 PLP [C (PLC(CS)) (M. RASHID KHAN Versus S. E. HIGHWAY CIRCLE). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Punjab Administrative Tribunals Act (IX of 1974)‑

Headnotes / Summary

S. 4‑AppealRight of‑Not exerciseable if departmental represen tation not yet finally decided by competent authorityDelay in deciding departmental representations, held, not good in interest of administration ‑ Long delay disapproved and competent authority asked to dispose of representation within three months. Appellant in person.

Judgment & Decree

S. E. HIGHWAY CIRCLE Case No. 467 of 1974, decided on 13th November 1974.

S. 4‑AppealRight of‑Not exerciseable if departmental represen tation not yet finally decided by competent authorityDelay in deciding departmental representations, held, not good in interest of administration ‑ Long delay disapproved and competent authority asked to dispose of representation within three months. Appellant in person. The grievance of the appellant is that the representation of 2‑7‑74 has not yet been decided by the competent authority. It is not in the interest of good administration that such representations should take such a long time before the competent authority can make up its mind. The competent authority should dispose of the representation of the appellant within three months. The appeal is disposed of accordingly.