1987 P Cr (PLP)
KHALIL‑UR‑REHMAN‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent
| Citation | 1987 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Munir Khan, J |
| Parties | KHALIL‑UR‑REHMAN‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1987 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1987 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Muhammad Munir Khan, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1987 P Cr (PLP) (KHALIL‑UR‑REHMAN‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Muhammad Akbar Cheema for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑ ‑‑‑S. 497‑‑Penal Code (YLV of 1860) S. 325/324/148/149‑‑Bail, grant of‑ ‑ Accused in jail and not required for investigation‑‑Grievous injury allegedly caused by accused not on vital part of body of injured‑ Offence, accused was charged with not falling within prohibitory clause of 5.497, Cr.P.C.‑‑Bail granted. Muhammad Akram Nasir for the State.
Judgment & Decree
This is an application for the grant of bail to Khalil‑ ur‑Rehman petitioner in case under sections 325/148/149, P.P.C. registered at P.S. Uggo‑ki District Sialkot vide F.I.R. No. 210 dated 20‑4‑1987.
2. The prosecution case is that the petitioner and 4 others in furtherance of their common object launched murderous assault on Mst. Riffat Naseem and Mst. Iqbal Naseem and inflicted injuries to them.
3. As for the petitioner, it has been alleged that he inflicted grievous injury with hockey on the right hand of Mst. Riffat.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the offence does not fall within the prohibitory clause of section 497, Cr.P.C. conversely the learned counsel for the State has opposed this bail application.
5. I have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties with care. I find that the alleged offences does not fall within the prohibitory clause of section 497, Cr.P.C., that the petitioner is in jail since 21‑5‑1987 and is not required for investigation and that the grievous injury is not on the vital part of the body.
6. For what has been said above, I feel that a case for the grant of bail to the petitioner is made out. He is, therefore, allowed bail in the sum of Rs.10,000 with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of AC/Duty Magistrate, Sialkot M.Y.H./K‑25/L Bail allowed.