2007 PLP 808 (YLR)
MUHAMMAD RAMZAN and 6 others — Applicants Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 2007 PLP 808 (YLR) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | Ali Sain Dino Metlo, J |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD RAMZAN and 6 others — Applicants Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2007 PLP 808 (YLR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2007 PLP 808 (YLR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: Ali Sain Dino Metlo, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2007 PLP 808 (YLR) (MUHAMMAD RAMZAN and 6 others — Applicants Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Headnotes / Summary
S. 526
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.324, 353 & 401/34
Application for
Court of Additional Sessions Judge where the case was pending adjudication, was lying vacant due to retirement of its Presiding Officer
Applicants due to enmity, apprehended danger to their lives by attending the Court without any progress in the case
Case was transferred from said Court to the Court of Sessions Judge, who could try case himself or entrust same to another 'Additional Sessions Judge working in the District. Jai Jai Veshno Mangay Ram for Applicants. Muhammad Ismail Bhutto State Counsel.
Judgment & Decree
Mr. Veshno states at the Court of Additional Sessions Judge-V, Shikarpur is lying vacant since October, 2006, due to retirement of its Presiding Officer and the applicants due to enmity apprehend danger to their lives by attending the Court without any progress in the case. In view of such statement of the learned counsel, S.C. No.95 of 2005 State v. Ramzan and others, under sections 324, 353, 401 and 34, P.P.C. based upon F.I.R. A No.31 of 2005 of Police Station Rustam is transferred from the Court of Additional Sessions Judge-V, Shikarpur to that of Sessions Judge, Shikarpur, who.may try the case himself or entrust it to .any other Additional Sessions Judge working in the District. H.B.T./M-1/K Case transferred.