1981 PLP 996 (CLC)
Mst. HAMEEDAN B1B1‑‑Applicant Versus MUHAMMAD YOUNUS‑Respondent
| Citation | 1981 PLP 996 (CLC) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | K.M A Samadani, J |
| Parties | Mst. HAMEEDAN B1B1‑‑Applicant Versus MUHAMMAD YOUNUS‑Respondent |
| Primary Law | West Pakistan Family Courts Act (XV of 1964)‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1981 PLP 996 (CLC)?
This judgment primarily cites: West Pakistan Family Courts Act (XV of 1964)‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1981 PLP 996 (CLC)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: K.M A Samadani, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1981 PLP 996 (CLC) (Mst. HAMEEDAN B1B1‑‑Applicant Versus MUHAMMAD YOUNUS‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- M. R. Chughtai for Petitioner.
- Mueeduddin Khan for Respondent.
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑ S. 25‑A‑Transfer of family cases‑Husband filing suit against wife at G and wife filing suit against husband at S‑Wife seeking transfer of husband's suit to S on ground of she being a resident of S‑Both suits filed in Family Courts‑Matter as to bow Family Court at S goes to decide issue of wife's residence and consequently question of jurisdiction yet to be seen‑Held : Premature in circum stances to order transfer of case at such stage but wife in case of being held to be a resident of S could move for transfer of case, if so advised.
Judgment & Decree
MUHAMMAD YOUNUS‑Respondent Transfer Application No. 212/C of 1980, decided on 6th July, 1980. ‑‑ S. 25‑A‑Transfer of family cases‑Husband filing suit against wife at G and wife filing suit against husband at S‑Wife seeking transfer of husband's suit to S on ground of she being a resident of S‑Both suits filed in Family Courts‑Matter as to bow Family Court at S goes to decide issue of wife's residence and consequently question of jurisdiction yet to be seen‑Held : Premature in circum stances to order transfer of case at such stage but wife in case of being held to be a resident of S could move for transfer of case, if so advised. M. R. Chughtai for Petitioner. Mueeduddin Khan for Respondent.