MLD 1989

1989 PLP 757 (MLD)

M UKHTAR‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent

Jurisdiction / Court
Lahore
Decided Date
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 683/B of 1989, decided on 1st March, 1989.
Honorable Judges
Tanvir Ahmad Khan, J
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1989 PLP 757 (MLD)
Forum / Court Lahore
Bench Members Tanvir Ahmad Khan, J
Parties M UKHTAR‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent
Primary Law Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1989 PLP 757 (MLD)?

This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1989 PLP 757 (MLD)?

The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Tanvir Ahmad Khan, J.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1989 PLP 757 (MLD) (M UKHTAR‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑

Representation

  • Aqil Mirza for Petitioner.

Headnotes / Summary

‑‑‑S. 498‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.379‑‑Pre‑arrest bail, confirmation of‑ Occurrence had taken place three months prior to registration of case‑ Investigating Officer appearing alongwith record stated that complainant had shown his suspicion against accused‑‑m respect of theft taken place earlier‑ Nothing else was on record to connect accused with casd‑‑Interim bail already granted to accused was confirmed. Aftab Sherazi for the State:

Judgment & Decree

‑‑‑S. 498‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.379‑‑Pre‑arrest bail, confirmation of‑ Occurrence had taken place three months prior to registration of case‑ Investigating Officer appearing alongwith record stated that complainant had shown his suspicion against accused‑‑m respect of theft taken place earlier‑ Nothing else was on record to connect accused with casd‑‑Interim bail already granted to accused was confirmed. Aqil Mirza for Petitioner. Aftab Sherazi for the State: The petitioner Mukhtar has applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case registered against him vide F.I.R. No. 405 at Police Station Kothala Sheikhan, District Gujrat on 14‑8‑1988 under section 379, P.P.C. The facts necessary for the disposal of this petition are that Criminal Miscellaneous No. 127./H of 1987 was filed in this Court for the recovery of the present petitioner from the illegal detention of S.H.O. Police Station Kothala Sheikhan on 21‑2‑198:

9. Accordingly a bailiff was detailed, who reported on 22‑2‑1989 that the alleged detenu was kept at police station and according to the S.H.O. he had just been called as a suspect in the theft case No.405 dated 14‑8‑1988. However, the: arrest of the aforesaid detenu was not found in any paper and according to .the petitioner he was detained illegally since 15‑2‑1989. The habeas corpus petition was disposed of by setting the present petitioner at liberty. Subsequently, Miukhtar petitioner moved the bail application before this Court. The interim bail was granted to him on 22‑2‑1989. Today the Investigating Officer has appeared alongwith record. He states that the complainant of case No. 405 has shown his suspicion regarding the petitioner respecting the theft of his ox earlier taken place and a Zimni dated 10‑2‑1989 was already recorded to that effect. There is nothing else on record to connect the present petitioner with the alleged case of theft of ox respecting which F.I.R. was recorded on 14‑8‑1988. It is pertinent to mention here that this aforesaid case was registered on 14‑8‑1988 for an occurrence alleged to hi the taken place three months ago. In the circumstances of this case I confirm the in terim bail already granted to the petitioner. H.B.T./M‑1178/L Interim bail confirmed.