1981 PLP 1153 (CLC)
MUHAMMAD TUFAIL AND ANOTHER‑Petitioners Versus SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER (LANDS), LAHORE DIVISION,
| Citation | 1981 PLP 1153 (CLC) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD TUFAIL AND ANOTHER‑Petitioners Versus SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER (LANDS), LAHORE DIVISION, |
| Primary Law | (b) Counsel and client‑‑, (c) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1981 PLP 1153 (CLC)?
This judgment primarily cites: (b) Counsel and client‑‑, (c) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1981 PLP 1153 (CLC)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1981 PLP 1153 (CLC) (MUHAMMAD TUFAIL AND ANOTHER‑Petitioners Versus SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER (LANDS), LAHORE DIVISION,). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Talaat Farooq Sheikh for Petitioner.
- Nemo for Respondents Nos. 1 and 2.
- Sh. Abdul Aziz and Rana Muhammad Sarwar Khan for Respondents Nos. 3 and 4.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 151 read with Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 199‑Restora tion of writ petition dismissed for non‑prosecution‑Counsel served with date of hearing not appearing in Court.‑Dismissal of writ petition in default‑Held, not exceptionable‑High Court (Lahore) Rules and Orders, Vol. IV, O. VII‑8, r. 4 and Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O. V,. r. 17.
Judgment & Decree
Mon Mohan alias Monomohan Roy Chowdhury v. Ajit Kamal Dutta Gupta P L D 1954 Dacca 168 ref. (b) Counsel and client‑‑
‑‑‑‑ Notice of date of hearing of case‑Outsider counsel‑Held, cannot demand, as a matter of right, that he be informed of date of hearing by a letter from High Court. (c) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)‑
S. 151 read with Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 199‑Restora tion of writ petition dismissed for non‑prosecution‑Counsel served with date of hearing not appearing in Court.‑Dismissal of writ petition in default‑Held, not exceptionable‑High Court (Lahore) Rules and Orders, Vol. IV, O. VII‑8, r. 4 and Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O. V,. r. 17. Abdul Lateef v. Jamal Din 1979 S C M R 183 ref. Sultan Ahmad and another v. Mst. Khurshid Bibi and another 1979 S C M R 455 cited but not examined. Talaat Farooq Sheikh for Petitioner. Nemo for Respondents Nos. 1 and 2. Sh. Abdul Aziz and Rana Muhammad Sarwar Khan for Respondents Nos. 3 and 4. Date of hearing : 14th June, 1981.