P L D 1978 Karachi 35 (PLP)
GUL AHMED TEXTILE MILLS LTD.-Petitioner Versus PRESIDING OFFICER, SIND LABOUR COURT
| Citation | P L D 1978 Karachi 35 (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | S. 2(c)-"Employer"-Definition-Paragraphs (i) to (iii) of S. 2(c) self-contained and one excludes classes of establishments mentioned in others-Paragraph (iii), a residuary clause and applicable to establish ment not covered by preceding two paragraphs:-Words and phrases Industrial dispute. |
| Bench Members | Z. A. Channa, J |
| Parties | GUL AHMED TEXTILE MILLS LTD.-Petitioner Versus PRESIDING OFFICER, SIND LABOUR COURT |
| Primary Law | (b) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), (a) West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VI of 1968) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in P L D 1978 Karachi 35 (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: (b) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), (a) West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VI of 1968) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case P L D 1978 Karachi 35 (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the S. 2(c)-"Employer"-Definition-Paragraphs (i) to (iii) of S. 2(c) self-contained and one excludes classes of establishments mentioned in others-Paragraph (iii), a residuary clause and applicable to establish ment not covered by preceding two paragraphs:-Words and phrases Industrial dispute. bench comprising: Z. A. Channa, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: P L D 1978 Karachi 35 (PLP) (GUL AHMED TEXTILE MILLS LTD.-Petitioner Versus PRESIDING OFFICER, SIND LABOUR COURT). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Khalid Jamil for Petitioner.
- Shahenshah Hussain for Respondent No. 2.
- Date of hearing : 27th August 1978.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 2(c)-"Employer"-Definition-Paragraphs (i) to (iii) of S. 2(c) self-contained and one excludes classes of establishments mentioned in others-Paragraph (iii), a residuary clause and applicable to establish ment not covered by preceding two paragraphs:-[Words and phrases Industrial dispute]. -- O. XLI, r. 27-Additional evidence-Leading of additional evidence in proceedings arising from a constitutional petition -Held, cannot be allowed-Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 199.-[Evidence]. Respondent No. 1 (absent).
Judgment & Decree
S. 2(c)‑"Employer"‑Definition‑Paragraphs (i) to (iii) of S. 2(c) self‑contained and one excludes classes of establishments mentioned in others‑Paragraph (iii), a residuary clause and applicable to establish ment not covered by preceding two paragraphs:‑[Words and phrases Industrial dispute]. (b) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)‑ ‑‑ O. XLI, r. 27‑Additional evidence‑Leading of additional evidence in proceedings arising from a constitutional petition ‑Held, cannot be allowed‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 199.‑[Evidence]. Khalid Jamil for Petitioner. Respondent No. 1 (absent). Shahenshah Hussain for Respondent No. 2. Date of hearing : 27th August 1978.