2021 PLP 730 (YLR)
AKHTAR ALI — Appellant Versus MUHAMMAD YAAR — Respondent
| Citation | 2021 PLP 730 (YLR) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Ch. Muhammad Iqbal, J |
| Parties | AKHTAR ALI — Appellant Versus MUHAMMAD YAAR — Respondent |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2021 PLP 730 (YLR)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2021 PLP 730 (YLR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Ch. Muhammad Iqbal, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2021 PLP 730 (YLR) (AKHTAR ALI — Appellant Versus MUHAMMAD YAAR — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Malik Muhammad Aslam for Respondent.
Judgment & Decree
CH. MUHAMMAD IQBAL, J.
Through this Execution First Appeal, the appellant has challenged the vires of order dated 19.01.2019 whereby the learned executing court consigned the file of execution petition to the record room after satisfaction of the decree.
2. Brief facts of the case are that the appellant/plaintiff filed suit for recovery of Rs.15,00,000/- under Order XXXVII, C.P.C. on the basis of pronote. The said suit was decreed vide judgment and decree dated 05.12.2017. In the execution petition of the appellant a compromise was effected between the parties with some terms and conditions. Under the said compromise the respondent/judgment debtor paid the settled amount whereafter the learned executing court after satisfaction of the decree consigned the petition to the record room vide order dated 19.01.2019. Hence, this appeal on the ground that the respondent/judgment debtor has not fulfilled the terms and conditions of the compromise, as such, main judgment and decree became restored for execution.
5. I have heard the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for both the parties and gone through the record with their able assistance.
6. The agreement was made between the parties which is available on record as Mark-A. For ready reference, operative part of the terms of the compromise (Mark-A) is reproduced as under:- And the parties recorded their statements on 30.08.2018 which are as under:-- After the compromise the respondent make payment of the agreed amount as detailed below:- Sr.No. Date of payment Amount 1 30.08.2018 340000 2. 22.09.2018 135000 3. 24.11.2018 220000 4. 21.12.2018 165000 5. 19.01.2019 90000 Total 9,50,000 All the above amounts were received by the plaintiff/appellant without any objection and in this way, total agreed amount was received by him and there is nothing outstanding against the respondent, as such, execution was rightly consigned to the record room by the learned executing court after satisfaction of the decree, which does not suffer from any legal infirmity.
7. As discussed above, this appeal has no merit and the same is hereby dismissed. SA/A-57/L Appeal dismissed.