SCMR 1999

1999SCMR1313 (PLP)

NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN and another — Petitioners Versus Rana MUHAMMAD KHALIL — Respondent

Jurisdiction / Court
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Decided Date
Civil Petition No.982-L of 1998, decided on 9th July, 1998.
Honorable Judges
Irshad Hasan Khan and Ch. Muhammad Arif, JJ
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1999SCMR1313 (PLP)
Forum / Court Supreme Court of Pakistan
Bench Members Irshad Hasan Khan and Ch. Muhammad Arif, JJ
Parties NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN and another — Petitioners Versus Rana MUHAMMAD KHALIL — Respondent
Primary Law Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1999SCMR1313 (PLP)?

This judgment primarily cites: Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1999SCMR1313 (PLP)?

The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan bench comprising: Irshad Hasan Khan and Ch. Muhammad Arif, JJ.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1999SCMR1313 (PLP) (NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN and another — Petitioners Versus Rana MUHAMMAD KHALIL — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973)

Representation

  • Mahmudul-Islam, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioners.
  • Hafiz Tariq Nasim, Advocate Supreme Court with Tanvir Ahmed, Advocate-on-Record for Respondent.
  • Date of hearing: 9th July, 1998.

Headnotes / Summary

(On appeal from the judgment dated 12-6-1998 passed by the Federal Service Tribunal, Lahore in Appeal No. 1037(L) of 1998).

S.4

Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 212(3)

Optional retirement-- Withdrawal

Request of civil servant for optional retirement was allowed by employer and civil servant was released from service after giving him pension and other financial benefits to which he was entitled under the Rules

Civil servant later moved representation on humanitarian basis for withdrawal of optional retirement with a view to avail benefit of "Gol en andshake Scheme", but such request was declined

Service Tribunal accepted appeal of civil servant against order of employer and directed reinstatement of civil servant

Leave to appeal was granted by Supreme Court to consider whether Service Tribunal was justified, in facts and circumstances of the case, in directing reinstatement of civil servant who voluntarily applied for optional retirement and after acceptance of his application, had received all financial and pensionary benefits.

Judgment & Decree

IRSHAD HASAN KHAN, J.

Leave to appeal is sought against the judgment, dated 12-6-1998 passed by the Federal Service Tribunal, Lahore, hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal, in Appeal No. 1037(L) of 1998.

2. Relevant facts are that the respondent, an employee of the petitioner Bank, submitted an application to the Regional Audit Chief of the Bank on 9-10-1996, praying therein for optional retirement on medical grounds with effect from 10-7-1997. Vide Staff Order dated 10-7-1997, the respondent's request for optional retirement was allowed and he was relieved from Bank Service on 6-8-1997. The respondent applied for pension and other financial benefits to which he was entitled under the Bank's Rules. The same were also received by him on 29-10-1997 and 1-11-1997. It is alleged that presently he continues to receive the pension as well as Financial Assistance from Benevolent Funds, as aforesaid, each month. On 15-10-1997 the petitioner moved another representation on humanitarian basis for withdrawal of optional retirement with a view to avail the benefits of "Golden Handshake Scheme" introduced by the Government of Pakistan. The request was declined by the petitioner. Eventually, the respondent moved the Tribunal which accepted his appeal by directing his reinstatement in service.

3. We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondent/caveator.

4. Leave is granted to consider whether the Tribunal was justified, in the facts and circumstances of the case, in directing reinstatement of the respondent who voluntarily applied for optional retirement and after acceptance of the said application received all financial and pensionary benefits, which he is still continuing to enjoy.

5. Operation of the impugned judgment is suspended till the disposal of the appeal. H.B.T./M-36/S Leave to appeal granted.