MLD 2000

2000 PLP 117 (MLD)

SHAHID MAHMOOD alias SHAHID IMRAN‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent

Jurisdiction / Court
Lahore
Decided Date
Criminal Miscellaneous No.2132‑B of 1998, decided on 18th May, 1998.
Honorable Judges
Falak Sher, J
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 2000 PLP 117 (MLD)
Forum / Court Lahore
Bench Members Falak Sher, J
Parties SHAHID MAHMOOD alias SHAHID IMRAN‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent
Primary Law Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑‑
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2000 PLP 117 (MLD)?

This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2000 PLP 117 (MLD)?

The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Falak Sher, J.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 2000 PLP 117 (MLD) (SHAHID MAHMOOD alias SHAHID IMRAN‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑‑

Representation

  • Zahid Hussain Khan for Petitioner. Muhammad Asif for the State. Sadaqat Mehmud Butt for the Complainant.

Headnotes / Summary

‑‑‑‑S. 497‑‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 324/337‑F (iii)/148/149‑‑‑Bail, grant of‑‑‑Locale of ascribed injury was on non‑vital part for which injured was released a day after from hospital ‑‑‑Co‑accused with identical role, though on account of minority, having been released on bail, accused was, too, entitled to concession of bail who had served more than 6 months and with the submission of challan, he was no more required by Investigating Agency especially when commencement of trial was not in sight‑‑‑Accused was granted bail in circumstances.

Judgment & Decree

‑‑‑‑S. 497‑‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 324/337‑F (iii)/148/149‑‑‑Bail, grant of‑‑‑Locale of ascribed injury was on non‑vital part for which injured was released a day after from hospital ‑‑‑Co‑accused with identical role, though on account of minority, having been released on bail, accused was, too, entitled to concession of bail who had served more than 6 months and with the submission of challan, he was no more required by Investigating Agency especially when commencement of trial was not in sight‑‑‑Accused was granted bail in circumstances. Zahid Hussain Khan for Petitioner. Muhammad Asif for the State. Sadaqat Mehmud Butt for the Complainant. Petitioner having been arrested in the case registered vide F.I.R. No.272 of 24‑10‑1997 under section 324/337‑F(iii)/,148/149, P.P.C. at Police Station vanike Tarrar District Hafizabad alleging causation of a rifle shot injury by the petitioner on left elbow of the complainant's brother Fida Hussain while engaged in peddy field to whom his brother Hameed Ahmed supplemented likewise injury on the left flank as members of an unlawful assembly around 4‑00 p.m. on the preceding evening with a view to avenging the altercation ensued between the petitioner and the injured over damaging of peddy crops 3/4 days‑ago, has sought bail.

2. Contending that locale of the ascribed injury is on non‑vital part for which the injured was relieved a day after from the District Headquarters Hospital and got himself privately treated and was discharged .a day later; consistency viz. co‑accused Hamid with identical role though on account of minority having been released on bail by a Judicial Magistrate 5‑months ago i.e. on 6‑1‑1998, he too is entitled to the concession having served more than 6 months and with the submission of challan is no more required by the Investigating Agency commencement of trial whereof is not in sight.

3. Which has been opposed by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the complainant as well as the state reiterating the prosecution story without dislodging the contentions urged upon instructions imparted by the police official in attendance equipped with the record, persuaded whereby the petitioner is allowed bail upon furnishing bond in the sum of Rs.50,000 with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court. H.B.T./S‑241/L Bail allowed.