1988 PLP 1763 (SCMR)
Syed MANZOOR HUSSAIN GHAZI — Petitioner Versus Mst. KISHWAR SULTAN JEHAN BEGUM and others — Respondents
| Citation | 1988 PLP 1763 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Abdul Kadir Shaikh, Ghulam Mujaddid Mirza and Saad Saood Jan, JJ |
| Parties | Syed MANZOOR HUSSAIN GHAZI — Petitioner Versus Mst. KISHWAR SULTAN JEHAN BEGUM and others — Respondents |
| Primary Law | Supreme Court Rules, 1980 |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1988 PLP 1763 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Supreme Court Rules, 1980 as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1988 PLP 1763 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Abdul Kadir Shaikh, Ghulam Mujaddid Mirza and Saad Saood Jan, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1988 PLP 1763 (SCMR) (Syed MANZOOR HUSSAIN GHAZI — Petitioner Versus Mst. KISHWAR SULTAN JEHAN BEGUM and others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Nemo for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 13th June, 1988.
Headnotes / Summary
O.XXVI, R.1--Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.188--Review petition, not in accordance with Rules--Effect of petitioner seeking relief to be joined as party in a Review petition--Review Petition itself having been dismissed as withdrawn, petitioner's miscellaneous petition also became infructuous and dismissed--Petitioner's fresh Miscellaneous Petitions for recall of earlier order tantamounting to review earlier order passed by the Court--Petitions having not been filed in accordance with relevant rules, dismissed. Petitioner in person.
Judgment & Decree
ABDUL KADIR SHAIKH, J.‑‑These are Miscellaneous Petitions requesting for recall of the order of this Court dated 20‑10‑1985 by which Civil Miscellaneous Petition No.490‑R of 1983 filed by the petitioner was dismissed on the ground that it had been rendered infructuous. The reason for which it was held to have become infructuous was that Civil Review Petition No.25‑L of 1982 filed by Mst. Kishwar Sultan Jehan Begum, first respondent herein, was dismissed as withdrawn by her, and since petitioner had sought to be joined as party in that Civil Review Petition, his request was rendered in fructuous with the dismissal of the Review Petition. The order of this Court dated 20‑10‑1985 reads as under: "Learned counsel for the petitioner requests for grant of permission to withdraw the review petition. Permission is granted and the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. In view of dismissal of the review petition, the Miscellaneous Petition No.490‑R of 1983 has been rendered infructuous." Petitioner who appears in person in support of these Miscellaneous Petitions however, submits that he is entitled to a direction being issued to the Chief Settlement Commissioner for the transfer of the property in question to him as it is available for transfer, and he could not press this request on 20‑10‑1985 when his Miscellaneous Petition No.490‑R of 1983 was dismissed for the reason that he had received notice of the hearing on 17‑10‑1985 and since the time available was very short, he could not engage a. counsel. We explained to the petitioner that these Miscellaneous Petitions in fact tantamount to a .petition for review of the order of this Court dated 20‑10‑1985, and since he has not filed a Review Petition in accordance with the rules, the Miscellaneous Petitions must be dismissed on this ground alone. We also explained to him that the best that could be done for him on 20‑10‑1985 was to join him as the party the Review Petition No.25‑L of 1982 if it were to be heard on merits, but since the petitioner in the Review Petition had prayed for grant of permission to withdraw that petition and her request was granted and the Review Petition was dismissed, he could not be joined as a party, nor could he be substituted as a petitioner in that Review Petition as none of the reliefs sought by Mst. Kishawar Sultan Jehan Begum was prayed for by him in Civil Miscellaneous Petition No.490‑R of 1983. Petitioner, however, insisted upon his request being granted for the recall of the order of this Court dated 20‑10‑1985 but we' regret we cannot accept his request for the reasons given above. These Miscellaneous Petitions are, therefore, dismissed. M . I . / M‑523 / S Petitions dismissed.