1986 PLP 1139 (PLC(CS))
JAVED AKHTAR Versus ALLIED BANK OF PAKISTAN, LAHORE
| Citation | 1986 PLP 1139 (PLC(CS)) |
| Forum / Court | Labour Appellate Tribunal Punjab |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Abdul Ghafoor Khan Lodhi, |
| Parties | JAVED AKHTAR Versus ALLIED BANK OF PAKISTAN, LAHORE |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1986 PLP 1139 (PLC(CS))?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1986 PLP 1139 (PLC(CS))?
The case was heard and decided by the Labour Appellate Tribunal Punjab bench comprising: Muhammad Abdul Ghafoor Khan Lodhi,.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1986 PLP 1139 (PLC(CS)) (JAVED AKHTAR Versus ALLIED BANK OF PAKISTAN, LAHORE). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- M.A. Khadim for Appellant.
- Saeed‑ur‑Rehman Farrukh for Respondent.
- Date of hearing: 1st June, 1986.
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑Art. 199‑‑Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969), Ss. 25‑A, 36 & 38‑‑Jurisdiction‑‑Labour Courts and Appellate Tribunal, held, would be subject to writ jurisdiction of High Court‑‑Dictums of High Court are to be followed by Labour Courts and Appellate Tribunal.
Judgment & Decree
M.A. Khadim for Appellant. Saeed‑ur‑Rehman Farrukh for Respondent. Date of hearing: 1st June, 1986. In the appeal titled above the decision, dated 15‑3‑1986 recorded by the learned Presiding Officer, Punjab Labour Court No. 1, Lahore has been challenged, whereby the grievance petition has been directed to be returned to the appellant for want of jurisdiction.
2. The learned lower Court has followed 1985 P L C 1053 for holding that the Labour Courts have no jurisdiction. As the orders passed by the Labour Courts and this tribunal are subject to writ jurisdiction of Lahore High Court, its dictums are to be followed. So, the learned lower Court rightly relied upon the ruling cited above. However, since the matter is pending before the Supreme Court and this is not known what will be the ultimate result, the ruling cited above is to be followed conditionally.
3. As a result, the appeal is dismissed with this direction that if the Supreme Court finds that the Labour Courts have jurisdiction, the appellant will be entitled to get his grievance petition decided by the learned lower Court, on merits. A. E. Appeal dismissed.