1989 PLP 1245 (SCMR)
DIN MUHAMMAD and others‑‑Petitioners Versus ADMINISTRATOR, THAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY and 50 others‑‑Respondents
| Citation | 1989 PLP 1245 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Afzal Zullah and Saad Saood Jan, JJ |
| Parties | DIN MUHAMMAD and others‑‑Petitioners Versus ADMINISTRATOR, THAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY and 50 others‑‑Respondents |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1989 PLP 1245 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1989 PLP 1245 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Muhammad Afzal Zullah and Saad Saood Jan, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1989 PLP 1245 (SCMR) (DIN MUHAMMAD and others‑‑Petitioners Versus ADMINISTRATOR, THAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY and 50 others‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Ch. Muhammad Farooq, Senior Advocate instructed by Rana Maqbool Ahmad, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioners.
- Ch. Khalilur Rehman, Senior Advocate and Sh. Salahuddin, Advocate -on‑Record for Respondent No.10.
- Date of hearing: 29th March, 1989.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the judgment dated 5th February, 1985 of the Lahore High Court in Writ Petition No.994 of 1963). ‑‑‑Art.185(3)‑‑Leave to appeal granted to petitioner who contented that similar points having been raised in Rab Nawaz Khan and others v. Administrator, Thal 1988 S C M R 797 the petitioner would succeed in this case also while respondent's side failed to distinguish the said case. Rab Nawaz Khan and others v. Administrator, Thal 1938 S C M R 797 ref. Nemo for the Remaining Respondents.
Judgment & Decree
MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH, J.‑‑Learned counsel has, in support of this petition, stated and argued that similar points having been raised in `Rab Nawaz Khan and others v. Administrator, Thal (1988 S C M R 797), the petitioners would succeed in this case also on the basis thereof. Learned counsel from the respondents' side has tried to distinguish it but with a statement that no effective relief has been claimed against his client. In view of what is stated above we consider it a tit case for grant of leave to appeal. Order accordingly. Security Rs.5,