SCMR 1989

1989 PLP 2052 (SCMR)

SALEEM RAZA Petitioner Versus TARIQ RASHID and 2 others — Respondents

Jurisdiction / Court
High Court
Decided Date
Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeal No.192 of 1983, decided on 5th November 1988.
Honorable Judges
Muhammad Haleem, CJ., Shafiur Rahman
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1989 PLP 2052 (SCMR)
Forum / Court High Court
Bench Members Muhammad Haleem, CJ., Shafiur Rahman
Parties SALEEM RAZA Petitioner Versus TARIQ RASHID and 2 others — Respondents
Primary Law Penal Code (XLV or 1860)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1989 PLP 2052 (SCMR)?

This judgment primarily cites: Penal Code (XLV or 1860) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1989 PLP 2052 (SCMR)?

The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Muhammad Haleem, CJ., Shafiur Rahman.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1989 PLP 2052 (SCMR) (SALEEM RAZA Petitioner Versus TARIQ RASHID and 2 others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Penal Code (XLV or 1860)

Representation

  • Khawaja Sultan Ahmad, Senior Advocate Supreme Court and Rana Maqbool Ahmad Qadri, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner.
  • Ch. Mehdi Khan Mehtab, Advocate-on-Record for Respondent No.2.
  • Date of hearing: 5th November, 1988.
  • Khawaja Sultan Ahmad, Senior Advocate Supreme Court and Rana Maqbool Ahmad Qadri, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
  • Ch. Mehdi Khan Mehtab, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondent No.2.

Headnotes / Summary

(On appeal from the judgment and order of the Lahore High Court, Lahore dated 13-4-1983, passed in Cr.A. No.568/79, Cr.A. No.580/79 and Cr.R.No.544/79).

S.302/34--Constitution of Pakistan (19731 Art. 185(3)--Petition for enhancement of sentence--High Court maintained the sentence of life imprisonment on the ground that murder was not premeditated but was a result of sudden flare-up--Conclusion being unexceptional petition for leave to appeal was dismissed.

Judgment & Decree

USMAN ALI SHAH, J.‑‑The petition seeks leave to appeal against the judgment dated 13‑4‑1983 of the Lahore High Court, Lahore, whereby his Criminal Revision No.544 of 1979 against the judgment of Addl. Sessions Judge, Lahore dated 30‑4‑1979, for the enhancement of sentences of life imprisonment on the respondents Nos.1 and 2, for the murder of Saifur Rahman deceased was dismissed by the impugned judgment. The prosecution case is that the occurrence took place at 4.15 p.m.on 9‑6‑1976 when on Lytton Road a collision between two cars coming from opposite sides, one driven by Abdul Shakoor (PW‑8) and the other by some other persons, was narrowly escaped. The car driven by other persons left the scene while Abdul Shakoor (P.W.8) remained with his car on the road. The people who gathered there suspected Abdul Shakoor that he might have stolen the car. On this the deceased got into the car and asked the boy to take the car back to the place from where he had stolen it. The moment he started the car, the present respondents Nos.1 and 2 who were standing in the crowd, came forward amd asked the deceased to come out of the car. When he carne out of the car, the respondent No.2 Liaqat Ali slapped him. Thereafter, both the respondents started giving dagger blows to the deceased. This occurrence was witnessed by Saleem Raza (PW‑9) the present petitioner, Raza Mir (PW‑11) both brothers of the deceased, Ghulam Mohammad (not produced), Bhola Khan (not produced) and Liaqat Ali (PW‑10). After commissionof the crime the accused respondents decamped from the scene of occurrence. The deceased was rushed to the hospital in a rickshaw in injured condition but before the arrival of the doctor he succumbed to his injuries in the hospital. The petitioner made his statement before the S.I.Jamshed Raza at Mayo Hospital, Lahore, on the basis of which a formal F.I.R. was recorded by the ASI Willayat Khan (PW‑1) at 5‑50 p.m. on the same day. Both the appellants were arrested by the S.I.(PW‑12) on 11‑6‑1976 and recoveries of the weapons of offence were made from them on 14‑6‑

76. The occurrence was witnessed by Saleem Raza (PW‑9) Raza Mir (PW‑11), both brothers of the deceased, Liaqat Ali (PW‑10) an unrelated person. Ghulam Muhammad and Bhola Katta were shown as eye‑witnessess in the F.I.R. but they were given up as unnecessary. At the trial the learned trial Judge relied on the ocular testimony of the witnesses and consequently convicted respondents Nos.1 and 2 under section 302/34, P.P.C. and sentenced them to life imprisonment with a fine of Rs.1,000 each to be paid to the heirs of the deceased on realization or in default to suffer further R.1 for six months, vide his judgment dated 30‑4‑1979. Both the respondents filed separate appeals against their conviction and sentences and the petitioner filed criminal revision for the enhancement of the sentences of both the respondents from life imprisonment to that of death. A learned Single Judge of the Lahore High Court who heard all the matters dismissed the same vide his judgment dated 13‑4‑1983. Hence this petition for leave to appeal by the petitioner. The High Court while upholding the conviction of the respondents maintained their sentences of life imprisonment principally on the ground that it was not a pre‑meditated murder "but a sudden flare‑up" on the unwanton interference of the deceased in attempting to find out whether the car driven by the boy was stolen or not, and has taken it to be an extenuating circumstance for the mitigation of their sentences. We do not find anything unexceptional in this conclusion. Accordingly, there is no merit in this petition which is dismissed. M.A.K./S‑401/S Petition dismissed.